Suppr超能文献

西地中海沿岸海洋样本中创伤弧菌检测与复苏策略的比较

A comparison of strategies for the detection and recovery of Vibrio vulnificus from marine samples of the western Mediterranean coast.

作者信息

Arias C R, Aznar R, Pujalte M J, Garay E

机构信息

Departamento de Microbiología, Universitat de València, Spain.

出版信息

Syst Appl Microbiol. 1998 Mar;21(1):128-34. doi: 10.1016/S0723-2020(98)80016-7.

Abstract

We have compared the effectiveness of culture-based methods and a DNA-based method for the detection, of Vibrio vulnificus from a seawater and three types of shellfish collected from the costal waters of Valencia, Spain. For culture-based method, we used two selective media, thiosulphate-citrate-salts-sucrose (TCBS), and cellobiose-polymyxin B-colistin (CPC) agars with and without previous enrichment in alkaline-saline-peptone-water (APWS). Presumptive colonies were confirmed as V. vulnificus by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using previously described 23S rRNA V. vulficus-specific sequences as primers (Dvu 9V and Dvu 45R). Direct detection was accomplished by a nested-PCR procedure developed for environmental samples, with the above mentioned primers for the second amplification. Of 32 seawater samples, only one yielded positive results by direct detection by PCR, whereas five were positive by culture methods. Of the 32 bivalve samples, two were positive by PCR and five by culture methods. From a total of 675 presumptive colonies selected on the two media, only 48 (20 from seawater and 28 from bivalves) were confirmed as V. vulnificus by PCR. Forty-six V. vulnificus isolates were obtained after enrichment and only two after direct inoculation of CPC. Except for one sampling, positive results by direct detection did not correlate with confirmed strains obtained from culture media. API 20E profiles were recorded for all isolates previously identified as V. vulnificus, revealing that around 20% of the strains were sucrose-positive. For our samples, the best strategy consisted in the combination of culture based methods (3 h enrichment in APWs at 40 degrees C followed by CPC at the same temperature) and DNA-based procedures (specific PCR amplification of the presumptive colonies with primers Dvu 9V and Dvu 45 R), which allowed the detection and accurate identification of V. vulnificus in less than 48h. This is the first report on the detection of cells of V. vulnificus naturally present in seawater and edible shellfish in the Spanish Mediterranean coast.

摘要

我们比较了基于培养的方法和基于DNA的方法在检测西班牙巴伦西亚沿海水域采集的海水及三种贝类中的创伤弧菌方面的有效性。对于基于培养的方法,我们使用了两种选择性培养基,即硫代硫酸盐-柠檬酸盐-胆盐-蔗糖(TCBS)琼脂和纤维二糖-多粘菌素B-粘菌素(CPC)琼脂,且有的进行了碱性盐胨水(APWS)预增菌,有的没有。通过聚合酶链反应(PCR),使用先前描述的23S rRNA创伤弧菌特异性序列作为引物(Dvu 9V和Dvu 45R),将疑似菌落确认为创伤弧菌。直接检测通过为环境样品开发的巢式PCR程序完成,上述引物用于第二次扩增。在32份海水样品中,只有1份通过PCR直接检测呈阳性结果,而通过培养方法有5份呈阳性。在32份双壳贝类样品中,2份通过PCR呈阳性,5份通过培养方法呈阳性。在两种培养基上挑选出的总共675个疑似菌落中,只有48个(20个来自海水,28个来自双壳贝类)通过PCR确认为创伤弧菌。富集后获得了46株创伤弧菌分离株,直接接种于CPC后仅获得2株。除了一次采样外,直接检测的阳性结果与从培养基中获得的已确认菌株不相关。对所有先前鉴定为创伤弧菌的分离株记录了API 20E谱型,结果显示约20%的菌株蔗糖呈阳性。对于我们的样品,最佳策略是将基于培养的方法(40℃在APWs中富集3小时,然后在相同温度下使用CPC)和基于DNA的程序(用引物Dvu 9V和Dvu 45R对疑似菌落进行特异性PCR扩增)相结合,这样能在不到48小时内检测并准确鉴定创伤弧菌。这是关于在西班牙地中海沿岸海水和可食用贝类中自然存在的创伤弧菌细胞检测的首次报告。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验