Babiloni F, Carducci F, Babiloni C, Urbano A
Institute of Human Physiology, Division of High Resolution EEG, University of Rome La Sapienza, Italy.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Apr;106(4):336-43. doi: 10.1016/s0013-4694(97)00124-7.
In this study we investigated the effects of lambda correction, generalized cross-validation (GCV), and Tikhonov regularization techniques on the realistic Laplacian (RL) estimate of highly-sampled (128 channels) simulated and actual EEG potential distributions. The simulated EEG potential distributions were mathematically generated over a 3-shell spherical head model (analytic potential distributions). Noise was added to the analytic potential distributions to mimic EEG noise. The magnitude of the noise was 20, 40 and 80% that of the analytic potential distributions. Performance of the regularization techniques was evaluated by computing the root mean square error (RMSE) between regularized RL estimates and analytic surface Laplacian solutions. The actual EEG data were human movement-related and short-latency somatosensory-evoked potentials. The RL of these potentials was estimated over a realistically-shaped, magnetic resonance-constructed model of the subject's scalp surface. The RL estimate of the simulated potential distributions was improved with all the regularization techniques. However, the lambda correction and Tikhonov regularization techniques provided more precise Laplacian solutions than the GCV computation (P < 0.05); they also improved better than the GCV computation the spatial detail of the movement-related and short-latency somatosensory-evoked potential distributions. For both simulated and actual EEG potential distributions the Tikhonov and lambda correction techniques provided nearly equal Laplacian solutions, but the former offered the advantage that no preliminary simulation was required to regularize the RL estimate of the actual EEG data.
在本研究中,我们调查了λ校正、广义交叉验证(GCV)和蒂霍诺夫正则化技术对高采样率(128通道)模拟和实际脑电图电位分布的逼真拉普拉斯(RL)估计的影响。模拟的脑电图电位分布是在一个3层球头模型上通过数学方法生成的(解析电位分布)。向解析电位分布中添加噪声以模拟脑电图噪声。噪声幅度为解析电位分布的20%、40%和80%。通过计算正则化RL估计值与解析表面拉普拉斯解之间的均方根误差(RMSE)来评估正则化技术的性能。实际脑电图数据为与人类运动相关的短潜伏期体感诱发电位。这些电位的RL是在受试者头皮表面的逼真形状的磁共振构建模型上估计的。所有正则化技术都改善了模拟电位分布的RL估计。然而,λ校正和蒂霍诺夫正则化技术比GCV计算提供了更精确的拉普拉斯解(P<0.05);它们在改善与运动相关的和短潜伏期体感诱发电位分布的空间细节方面也比GCV计算更好。对于模拟和实际脑电图电位分布,蒂霍诺夫和λ校正技术提供了几乎相等的拉普拉斯解,但前者的优势在于,在对实际脑电图数据的RL估计进行正则化时不需要进行初步模拟。