van Kalmthout A
University of Brabant, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Eur Addict Res. 1998 Sep;4(3):102-6. doi: 10.1159/000018932.
This article deals with the question in how far an offence committed in the Netherlands under the influence of alcohol or other drugs can be imputed to the offender. Unlike many other countries the Dutch Penal Code does not contain specific provisions with respect to the criminal liability of addicted or intoxicated offenders. In principle, they are held responsible for their offences, even when the dolus or culpa is absent at the moment they commit their offence. Doctrine and jurisprudence found this liability on the principle of 'culpa/dolus in causa', by accepting an anterior dolus or culpa, which is situated at the moment the offender takes alcohol or other drugs. As is shown in this article, the - nondogmatic - interpretation of this culpa in causa doctrine leaves hardly any space for a claim to impunity.
本文探讨在荷兰,在酒精或其他药物影响下实施的犯罪在多大程度上可归咎于犯罪者。与许多其他国家不同,荷兰刑法典没有关于成瘾或醉酒犯罪者刑事责任的具体规定。原则上,他们要对自己的罪行负责,即使在犯罪时不存在故意或过失。学说和判例法基于“原因中的过失/故意”原则认定这种责任,即接受在犯罪者饮酒或服用其他药物时存在的先前故意或过失。如本文所示,对这一原因中的过失学说的非教条式解释几乎没有为免责主张留下空间。