Comparison of inhaled nitric oxide and inhaled aerosolized prostacyclin in the evaluation of heart transplant candidates with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Elevated pulmonary vascular resistance is a risk factor in heart transplantation and reversibility of high pulmonary vascular resistance is evaluated preoperatively in potential recipients using i.v. vasodilators or inhaled nitric oxide. Prostacyclin is a potent vasodilator, which when inhaled, has selective pulmonary vasodilatory properties. The aim of this study was to compare the central hemodynamic effects of inhaled prostacyclin with those of inhaled nitric oxide in heart transplant candidates.

DESIGN

A pharmacodynamic comparative study.

SETTING

Cardiothoracic ICU or laboratory for diagnostic heart catheterization at a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Ten heart transplant candidates with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (>200 dynes x s x cm(-5) and/or a transpulmonary pressure gradient > 10 mm Hg) were included in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Nitric oxide (40 ppm) and aerosolized prostacyclin (10 microg/mL) were administered by inhalation in two subsequent 10-min periods. Hemodynamic measurements preceded and followed inhalation of each agent.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Both inhaled nitric oxide and inhaled prostacyclin reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure (-7% vs -7%), pulmonary vascular resistance (-43% vs -49%), and the transpulmonary gradient (-44% vs -38%). With inhaled prostacyclin, an 11% increase in cardiac output was observed. Other hemodynamic variables, including the systemic BP, remained unaffected by each of the agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhaled prostacyclin induces a selective pulmonary vasodilation that is comparable to the effect of inhaled nitric oxide. Major advantages with inhaled prostacyclin are its lack of toxic reactions and easy administration as compared with the potentially toxic nitric oxide requiring more complicated delivery systems.