Suppr超能文献

吸入性依前列醇与一氧化氮在心脏大手术后对右心室支持的比较。

Inhaled Epoprostenol Compared With Nitric Oxide for Right Ventricular Support After Major Cardiac Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Divisions of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, and the Clinical Research Unit (K.G., M.C.W., J.H.L.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.

Department of Respiratory Therapy, Boise State University, ID (J.L.C.).

出版信息

Circulation. 2023 Oct 24;148(17):1316-1329. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062464. Epub 2023 Jul 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular failure (RVF) is a leading driver of morbidity and death after major cardiac surgery for advanced heart failure, including orthotopic heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device implantation. Inhaled pulmonary-selective vasodilators, such as inhaled epoprostenol (iEPO) and nitric oxide (iNO), are essential therapeutics for the prevention and medical management of postoperative RVF. However, there is limited evidence from clinical trials to guide agent selection despite the significant cost considerations of iNO therapy.

METHODS

In this double-blind trial, participants were stratified by assigned surgery and key preoperative prognostic features, then randomized to continuously receive either iEPO or iNO beginning at the time of separation from cardiopulmonary bypass with the continuation of treatment into the intensive care unit stay. The primary outcome was the composite RVF rate after both operations, defined after transplantation by the initiation of mechanical circulatory support for isolated RVF, and defined after left ventricular assist device implantation by moderate or severe right heart failure according to criteria from the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support. An equivalence margin of 15 percentage points was prespecified for between-group RVF risk difference. Secondary postoperative outcomes were assessed for treatment differences and included: mechanical ventilation duration; hospital and intensive care unit length of stay during the index hospitalization; acute kidney injury development including renal replacement therapy initiation; and death at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

Of 231 randomized participants who met eligibility at the time of surgery, 120 received iEPO, and 111 received iNO. Primary outcome occurred in 30 participants (25.0%) in the iEPO group and 25 participants (22.5%) in the iNO group, for a risk difference of 2.5 percentage points (two one-sided test 90% CI, -6.6% to 11.6%) in support of equivalence. There were no significant between-group differences for any of the measured postoperative secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing major cardiac surgery for advanced heart failure, inhaled pulmonary-selective vasodilator treatment using iEPO was associated with similar risks for RVF development and development of other postoperative secondary outcomes compared with treatment using iNO.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT03081052.

摘要

背景

右心衰竭(RVF)是晚期心力衰竭患者接受重大心脏手术后发病率和死亡率的主要驱动因素,包括原位心脏移植和左心室辅助装置植入。吸入性肺选择性血管扩张剂,如吸入性前列环素(iEPO)和一氧化氮(iNO),是预防和治疗术后 RVF 的重要治疗方法。然而,尽管 iNO 治疗的成本考虑因素显著,但临床试验提供的指导药物选择的证据有限。

方法

在这项双盲试验中,参与者根据分配的手术和关键术前预后特征进行分层,然后随机接受 iEPO 或 iNO 治疗,从体外循环分离时开始,持续到重症监护病房。主要结局是两种手术后的复合 RVF 发生率,在移植后定义为孤立性 RVF 机械循环支持的启动,在左心室辅助装置植入后定义为根据机械循环辅助机构间登记处的标准发生中度或重度右心衰竭。预先规定了 15 个百分点的组间 RVF 风险差异的等效边界。对治疗差异进行了二次术后评估,包括:机械通气持续时间;索引住院期间的住院和重症监护病房住院时间;急性肾损伤的发展,包括开始肾脏替代治疗;以及手术后 30 天、90 天和 1 年的死亡。

结果

在符合手术时入选标准的 231 名随机参与者中,120 名接受了 iEPO,111 名接受了 iNO。EPO 组有 30 名(25.0%)参与者和 iNO 组有 25 名(22.5%)参与者发生主要结局,风险差异为 2.5 个百分点(双侧单侧检验 90%置信区间,-6.6%至 11.6%)支持等效性。在任何测量的术后次要结局方面,两组之间均无显著差异。

结论

在接受晚期心力衰竭重大心脏手术的患者中,与使用 iNO 相比,使用 iEPO 进行吸入性肺选择性血管扩张剂治疗与 RVF 发展和其他术后次要结局的发展风险相似。

注册

网址:https://www.

临床试验

gov;独特标识符:NCT03081052.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验