Khan Tanveer A, Schnickel Gabriel, Ross David, Bastani Sam, Laks Hillel, Esmailian Fardad, Marelli Daniel, Beygui Ramin, Shemin Richard, Watson Larry, Vartapetian Irina, Ardehali Abbas
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1741, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Dec;138(6):1417-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.04.063.
Inhaled nitric oxide has been shown to reduce pulmonary vascular resistance in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery, but it is limited by toxicity, the need for special monitoring, and cost. Inhaled prostacyclin also decreases pulmonary artery pressure, is relatively free of toxicity, requires no specific monitoring, and is less expensive. The objective of this study was to compare nitric oxide and prostacyclin in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension, refractory hypoxemia, and right ventricular dysfunction in thoracic transplant recipients in a prospective, randomized, crossover pilot trial.
Heart transplant and lung transplant recipients were randomized to nitric oxide or prostacyclin as initial treatment, followed by a crossover to the other agent after 6 hours. Pulmonary vasodilators were initiated in the operating room for pulmonary hypertension, refractory hypoxemia, or right ventricular dysfunction. Nitric oxide was administered at 20 ppm, and prostacyclin was administered at 20,000 ng/mL. Hemodynamic and oxygenation parameters were recorded before and after initiation of pulmonary vasodilator therapy. At 6 hours, the hemodynamic and oxygenation parameters were recorded again, just before discontinuing the initial agent. Crossover baseline parameters were measured 30 minutes after the initial agent had been stopped. The crossover agent was then started, and the hemodynamic and oxygenation parameters were measured again 30 minutes later.
Heart transplant and lung transplant recipients (n = 25) were randomized by initial treatment (nitric oxide, n = 14; prostacyclin, n = 11). Nitric oxide and prostacyclin both reduced pulmonary artery pressure and central venous pressure, and improved cardiac index and mixed venous oxygen saturation on initiation of therapy. More importantly, at the 6-hour crossover trial, there were no significant differences between nitric oxide and prostacyclin in the reduction of pulmonary artery pressures or central venous pressure, or in improvement in cardiac index or mixed venous oxygen saturation. Nitric oxide and prostacyclin did not affect the oxygenation index or systemic blood pressure. There were no complications associated with nitric oxide or prostacyclin.
In heart transplant and lung transplant recipients, nitric oxide and prostacyclin similarly reduce pulmonary artery pressures and central venous pressure, and improve cardiac index and mixed venous oxygen saturation. Inhaled prostacyclin may offer an alternative to nitric oxide in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in thoracic transplantation.
吸入一氧化氮已被证明可降低心胸外科手术患者的肺血管阻力,但它受到毒性、特殊监测需求和成本的限制。吸入前列环素也可降低肺动脉压,相对无毒,无需特殊监测,且成本较低。本研究的目的是在前瞻性、随机、交叉试点试验中比较一氧化氮和前列环素在治疗胸段移植受者的肺动脉高压、难治性低氧血症和右心室功能障碍方面的效果。
心脏移植和肺移植受者被随机分为接受一氧化氮或前列环素作为初始治疗,6小时后交叉使用另一种药物。在手术室中针对肺动脉高压、难治性低氧血症或右心室功能障碍启动肺血管扩张剂治疗。一氧化氮以20 ppm的浓度给药,前列环素以20,000 ng/mL的浓度给药。在启动肺血管扩张剂治疗前后记录血流动力学和氧合参数。在6小时时,在停止初始药物之前再次记录血流动力学和氧合参数。在初始药物停止30分钟后测量交叉基线参数。然后启动交叉药物,并在30分钟后再次测量血流动力学和氧合参数。
心脏移植和肺移植受者(n = 25)按初始治疗进行随机分组(一氧化氮组,n = 14;前列环素组,n = 11)。在治疗开始时,一氧化氮和前列环素均降低了肺动脉压和中心静脉压,并改善了心脏指数和混合静脉血氧饱和度。更重要的是,在6小时交叉试验中,一氧化氮和前列环素在降低肺动脉压或中心静脉压,或改善心脏指数或混合静脉血氧饱和度方面没有显著差异。一氧化氮和前列环素不影响氧合指数或全身血压。没有与一氧化氮或前列环素相关的并发症。
在心脏移植和肺移植受者中,一氧化氮和前列环素同样能降低肺动脉压和中心静脉压,并改善心脏指数和混合静脉血氧饱和度。吸入前列环素在胸段移植中治疗肺动脉高压方面可能是一氧化氮的一种替代选择。