• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种不可逆水胶体印模材料的撕裂强度。

Tear strength of four irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials.

作者信息

Cohen B I, Pagnillo M K, Musikant B L, Deutsch A S

机构信息

Essential Dental Laboratories, South Hackensack, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 1998 Jun;7(2):111-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.1998.tb00189.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1532-849x.1998.tb00189.x
PMID:9743665
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the tear strength of four irreversible hydrocolloid (alginate) impression materials (Tare-Free Alg, Jeltrate, Identic, and Kromopan).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty specimens, 20 for each alginate tested, were according to the manufacturers' instructions. A cutting die described in American Standard Test and Material document D-1004-94a was used to prepare test specimens. Immediately after removal from the cutting die, test specimens were measured at five points with an electronic caliper. Test specimens were placed into a specialized jig, and a Shimpo force gauge was used to measure tear strength. The tear test was performed no more than 10 minutes after mixing the alginate material with water. The tear strength was then calculated. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the mean force required to induce tearing for each of the four groups, followed by the Newman-Keuls pairwise multiple comparisons test.

RESULTS

Results were considered statistically significant at p < .05. There was a statistically significant difference between alginate materials (p < .0001). The Newman-Keuls multiple comparisons procedure showed that Tare-Free Alg (514.5 g/cm) had a significantly higher tear strength value (p < .0001) than Jeltrate (259.0 g/cm), Identic (289.9 g/cm), and Kromopan (323.9 g/cm).

CONCLUSIONS

Tare-Free Alg had the highest tear strength value, followed by Jeltrate, Identic, and Kromopan.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是检测四种不可逆水胶体(藻酸盐)印模材料(无撕裂藻酸盐、Jeltrate、Identic和Kromopan)的撕裂强度。

材料与方法

按照制造商的说明制备了80个样本,每种测试藻酸盐各20个。使用美国材料与试验协会标准文件D-1004-94a中描述的切割模具制备测试样本。从切割模具中取出后,立即用电子卡尺在五个点测量测试样本。将测试样本放入专门的夹具中,并用岛津测力计测量撕裂强度。在将藻酸盐材料与水混合后不超过10分钟进行撕裂测试。然后计算撕裂强度。使用单因素方差分析比较四组中每组引起撕裂所需的平均力,随后进行纽曼-基尔斯两两多重比较检验。

结果

当p < .05时,结果被认为具有统计学意义。藻酸盐材料之间存在统计学显著差异(p < .0001)。纽曼-基尔斯多重比较程序表明,无撕裂藻酸盐(514.5 g/cm)的撕裂强度值显著高于Jeltrate(259.0 g/cm)、Identic(289.9 g/cm)和Kromopan(323.9 g/cm)(p < .0001)。

结论

无撕裂藻酸盐的撕裂强度值最高,其次是Jeltrate、Identic和Kromopan。

相似文献

1
Tear strength of four irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials.四种不可逆水胶体印模材料的撕裂强度。
J Prosthodont. 1998 Jun;7(2):111-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.1998.tb00189.x.
2
Effect of mixing methods on mechanical properties of alginate impression materials.混合方法对藻酸盐印模材料力学性能的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2005 Dec;14(4):221-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00047.x.
3
Evaluation of outgassing, tear strength, and detail reproduction in alginate substitute materials.评价藻酸盐代用品的气体释放、撕裂强度和细节再现性能。
Oper Dent. 2012 Sep-Oct;37(5):540-7. doi: 10.2341/11-365-L. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
4
Facial moulage: the effect of a retarder on compressive strength and working and setting times of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.面部模型制作:缓凝剂对不可逆水胶体印模材料抗压强度、工作时间和凝固时间的影响
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Sep;90(3):276-81. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00366-4.
5
The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.选定变量对不可逆水胶体印模材料固位的影响。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Sep 1;9(6):57-64.
6
Effect of storage time on mechanical properties of extended-pour irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials.储存时间对注压型水胶体印模材料机械性能的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jul;124(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.001. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
7
Accuracy and bond strength of reversible with irreversible hydrocolloid impression systems: a comparative study.可逆与不可逆水胶体印模系统的准确性和粘结强度:一项对比研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Oct;68(4):578-84. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90369-l.
8
Impact of water quality on setting of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials.水质对不可逆水胶体印模材料凝固的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Dec;96(6):443-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.10.006.
9
Factors that affect the adhesion of two irreversible hydrocolloid materials to two custom tray materials.影响两种不可逆水胶体材料与两种定制托盘材料之间黏附力的因素。
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Oct;88(4):423-30. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.128746.
10
An in vitro investigation into the physical properties of irreversible hydrocolloid alternatives.一种不可逆水胶体替代物物理性能的体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Nov;104(5):325-32. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60149-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanical and Physical Properties of an Experimental Chemically and Green-Nano Improved Dental Alginate after Proven Antimicrobial Potentials.经证实具有抗菌潜力后,一种经化学和绿色纳米改进的实验性牙科藻酸盐的机械和物理性能
Gels. 2023 May 21;9(5):429. doi: 10.3390/gels9050429.
2
Effect of Powder/Water Ratio Variation on Viscosity, Tear Strength and Detail Reproduction of Dental Alginate Impression Material ( and Clinical Study).粉水比对藻酸盐齿科印模材料粘度、撕裂强度及细节再现的影响(及临床研究)
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Aug 30;13(17):2923. doi: 10.3390/polym13172923.
3
Mechanical Properties of a New Vinyl Polyether Silicone in Comparison to Vinyl Polysiloxane and Polyether Elastomeric Impression Materials.
一种新型乙烯基聚醚硅氧烷与乙烯基聚硅氧烷和聚醚弹性体印模材料相比的机械性能
Contemp Clin Dent. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):203-207. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_324_18.