University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Oper Dent. 2012 Sep-Oct;37(5):540-7. doi: 10.2341/11-365-L. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
To compare three alginate substitute materials to an alginate impression material for cast surface porosity (outgassing), tear strength, and detail reproduction.
Detail reproduction tests were performed following American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association (ANSI/ADA) Specification No. 19. To measure tear strength, 12 samples of each material were made using a split mold, placed in a water bath until testing, and loaded in tension until failure at a rate of 500 mm/min using a universal testing machine. For cast surface porosity testing, five impressions of a Teflon mold with each material were placed in a water bath (37.8°C) for the in-mouth setting time and poured with vacuum-mixed Silky Rock die stone at 5, 10, 30, and 60 minutes from the start of mixing. The gypsum samples were analyzed with a digital microscope for surface porosity indicative of hydrogen gas release by comparing the surface obtained at each interval with four casts representing no, little, some, and significant porosity. Data analysis was performed using parametric and Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey/Kramer post-hoc tests (α=0.05), and individual Mann-Whitney U tests (α=0.0167).
All alginate substitute materials passed the detail reproduction test. Tear strength of the alginate substitute materials was significantly better than alginate and formed three statistically different groups: AlgiNot had the lowest tear strength, Algin-X Ultra had the highest tear strength, and Position Penta Quick had intermediate tear strength. Significant variation in outgassing existed between materials and pouring times (p<0.05). All alginate substitute materials exhibited the least outgassing and cast porosity 60 minutes after mixing.
Detail reproduction and tear strength of alginate substitute materials were superior to traditional alginate. The outgassing effect was minimal for most materials tested. Alginate substitute materials are superior replacements for irreversible hydrocolloid.
比较三种藻酸盐代用品与藻酸盐印模材料在铸件表面孔隙率(出气)、撕裂强度和细节再现方面的性能。
根据美国国家标准协会/美国牙科协会(ANSI/ADA)规范 No.19 进行细节再现测试。为了测量撕裂强度,使用分体模具制作每种材料的 12 个样本,将其放置在水浴中直至测试,然后以 500mm/min 的速率在万能试验机上进行拉伸直至失效。对于铸件表面孔隙率测试,将每种材料的五个聚四氟乙烯模具的印模放置在水浴(37.8°C)中进行口腔内设定时间,并在混合开始后 5、10、30 和 60 分钟用真空混合的 Silky Rock 牙石进行浇注。使用数字显微镜分析石膏样本的表面孔隙率,以指示氢气的释放,方法是将每个间隔获得的表面与代表无、少量、一些和显著孔隙率的四个铸件进行比较。使用参数和 Kruskal-Wallis 方差分析(ANOVA)、Tukey/Kramer 事后检验(α=0.05)和个体 Mann-Whitney U 检验(α=0.0167)进行数据分析。
所有藻酸盐代用品均通过了细节再现测试。藻酸盐代用品的撕裂强度明显优于藻酸盐,并形成了三个统计学上不同的组:AlgiNot 的撕裂强度最低,Algin-X Ultra 的撕裂强度最高,Position Penta Quick 的撕裂强度居中。材料和浇注时间之间存在明显的出气变化(p<0.05)。大多数测试材料在混合后 60 分钟内表现出最小的出气和铸件孔隙率。
藻酸盐代用品的细节再现和撕裂强度优于传统藻酸盐。大多数测试材料的出气效果最小。藻酸盐代用品是不可逆水胶体的理想替代品。