Suppr超能文献

甘氨酸B受体配体D-环丝氨酸和L-701,324的抗惊厥作用及不良反应:与竞争性和非竞争性N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体拮抗剂的比较

Anti-convulsant and adverse effects of the glycineB receptor ligands, D-cycloserine and L-701,324: comparison with competitive and non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists.

作者信息

Wlaź P

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Agricultural University, Lublin, Poland.

出版信息

Brain Res Bull. 1998 Aug;46(6):535-40. doi: 10.1016/s0361-9230(98)00051-3.

Abstract

In this study, the anticonvulsant and adverse effects of compounds that belong to four different categories of systemically available N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor ligands were compared, namely the competitive antagonist CGP 40116, the noncompetitive antagonist MK-801 (dizocilpine), the glycineB receptor antagonist L-701,324, and the glycineB receptor high-efficacy partial agonist D-cycloserine. The maximal electroshock seizures (MES), which are widely used to detect drug efficacy against generalized tonic-clonic seizures in humans, were produced by transcorneal electrical stimulation. Abolition of tonic hind-limb extension was taken as the end-point. The drug-induced motor and long-term memory deficits were quantified by using the inverted screen test and the step-through passive-avoidance test, respectively. All tested compounds exhibited significant anticonvulsant effect. The rank order of potency for the respective compounds was: MK-801 = CGP 40116 > L-701,324 >> D-cycloserine. All of these compounds induced motor impairment at doses close to those found to be anticonvulsant, however, hyperlocomotion and stereotyped behavior occurred only with MK-801. The highest protective indices [PI = TD50 (inverted screen)/ED50 (MES)] were calculated for CGP 40116 and D-cycloserine (2.4 and 2.2, respectively). When tested for memory impairment at one-half the MES ED50, again only MK-801 induced significant memory disruption in the passive avoidance test. In conclusion, these results suggest that glycineB receptor high-efficacy partial agonists and competitive NMDA receptor antagonists may be advantageous to noncompetitive NMDA antagonists and glycineB receptor antagonists as potential antiepileptic drugs.

摘要

在本研究中,比较了四类可全身应用的N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体配体化合物的抗惊厥作用及不良反应,即竞争性拮抗剂CGP 40116、非竞争性拮抗剂MK-801(地佐环平)、甘氨酸B受体拮抗剂L-701,324以及甘氨酸B受体高效部分激动剂D-环丝氨酸。通过经角膜电刺激诱发最大电休克惊厥(MES),这一方法广泛用于检测药物对人类全身强直阵挛性惊厥的疗效,以强直性后肢伸展消失作为终点。分别采用倒屏试验和穿梭箱被动回避试验对药物诱导的运动和长期记忆缺陷进行量化。所有受试化合物均表现出显著的抗惊厥作用。各化合物的效价顺序为:MK-801 = CGP 40116 > L-701,324 >> D-环丝氨酸。所有这些化合物在接近抗惊厥剂量时均诱导运动功能损害,然而,仅MK-801会引起活动增多和刻板行为。计算得到CGP 40116和D-环丝氨酸的最高保护指数[PI = TD50(倒屏试验)/ED50(MES)](分别为2.4和2.2)。在MES ED50的一半剂量下进行记忆损害测试时,同样只有MK-801在被动回避试验中诱导出显著的记忆破坏。总之,这些结果表明,作为潜在的抗癫痫药物,甘氨酸B受体高效部分激动剂和竞争性NMDA受体拮抗剂可能比非竞争性NMDA拮抗剂和甘氨酸B受体拮抗剂更具优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验