Suyama K, Kurita T, Shimizu W, Matsuo K, Taguchi A, Aihara N, Kamakura S, Shimomura K
National Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Sep;21(9):1693-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00266.x.
The retrograde atrial potential at a successful ablation site is usually obscured by the wide and large ventricular potential during atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia or ventricular pacing, which makes it difficult to determine the appropriate ablation site for a concealed accessory pathway. A pacing maneuver named the "simultaneous pacing method" is proposed herein to differentiate the retrograde atrial potential from the ventricular potential for a successful ablation of the concealed accessory pathway. Catheter ablation was performed in 12 patients with a single left free-wall concealed accessory pathway. The atrial insertion site was determined by the simultaneous pacing method in six patients (group I) and by ventricular pacing in six patients (group II). In the simultaneous pacing method, electrograms recorded during ventricular pacing in the earliest retrograde atrial activation site are a fusion of the ventricular potential and the following retrograde atrial potential. When atrial and ventricular pacings are performed simultaneously (simultaneous pacing), the end portion of the electrograms recorded at the same site is solely the ventricular component, because atrial is activated earlier. The atrial potential can be confirmed during ventricular pacing in comparison with the electrograms during the "simultaneous pacing." Radiofrequency catheter ablation was successful in eliminating conduction through the accessory pathway in all 12 patients. The radiofrequency applications in group I were significantly fewer than those in group II (1.7 +/- 1.0 in group I, 5.3 +/- 3.2 in group II, P < 0.05). The total procedure time in group I was significantly shorter than in group II (57.8 +/- 15.7 vs 106.7 +/- 41.6 mins in group II, respectively, P < 0.05). The fluoroscopy time in group I was significantly shorter than in group II (54.0 +/- 7.9 vs 81.3 +/- 26.3 mins, respectively, P < 0.05). We were able to determine the atrial insertion site of accessory pathways by the simultaneous pacing method. The simultaneous pacing method was useful in eliminating concealed left free-wall accessory pathways.
在房室折返性心动过速或心室起搏期间,成功消融部位的逆行心房电位通常会被宽大的心室电位所掩盖,这使得确定隐匿性旁路的合适消融部位变得困难。本文提出一种名为“同步起搏法”的起搏操作,以区分逆行心房电位和心室电位,从而成功消融隐匿性旁路。对12例左侧游离壁单隐匿性旁路患者进行了导管消融。6例患者(I组)通过同步起搏法确定心房插入部位,6例患者(II组)通过心室起搏确定心房插入部位。在同步起搏法中,最早逆行心房激动部位心室起搏时记录的电图是心室电位与随后逆行心房电位的融合。当心房和心室同时起搏(同步起搏)时,在同一部位记录的电图末端仅为心室成分,因为心房先被激动。与“同步起搏”期间的电图相比,心室起搏时可确认心房电位。12例患者经射频导管消融均成功消除了旁路传导。I组的射频应用次数明显少于II组(I组为1.7±1.0次,II组为5.3±3.2次,P<0.05)。I组的总手术时间明显短于II组(分别为57.8±15.7分钟和II组的106.7±41.6分钟,P<0.05)。I组的透视时间明显短于II组(分别为54.0±7.9分钟和81.3±26.3分钟,P<0.05)。我们能够通过同步起搏法确定旁路的心房插入部位。同步起搏法有助于消除隐匿性左侧游离壁旁路。