Carroll D, Surtees P G
Br J Psychol. 1976 Aug;67(3):367-75. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1976.tb01523.x.
Skin conductance response (SCR) was monitored as an index of the orienting response (OR) to a series of 20 tones presented to blind and sighted schoolchildren. Blind children showed fewer criterion SCRs than sighted children, and significantly more of the blind sample exhibited SCR habituation. The blind group also demonstrated fewer non-specific SCRs than sighted control subjects, but demonstrated a higher average skin conductance level (SCL). A second experiment found similar effects for deaf versus hearing children presented with simple visual stimulation, save that no significant difference was observed between these groups in SCL. These results can be explained by assuming that loss of modality results in more efficient development of a neuronal model of the salient features of stimuli impinging on the remaining intact modalities. An explanation in terms of the assessed significance of the stimulus situation can also be entertained. The atypical skin conductance activity of three of the blind group was given separate consideration.
监测皮肤电导率反应(SCR),以此作为盲童和视力正常学童对一系列20种音调的定向反应(OR)指标。与视力正常的儿童相比,盲童的标准SCR较少,且有显著更多的盲童样本出现SCR习惯化。与视力正常的对照组相比,盲童组的非特异性SCR也较少,但平均皮肤电导率水平(SCL)较高。第二个实验发现,对于接受简单视觉刺激的聋童和听力正常的儿童,也有类似的效果,只是两组之间在SCL上未观察到显著差异。这些结果可以通过假设感觉通道丧失会导致对作用于其余完整感觉通道的刺激的显著特征的神经元模型更有效地发育来解释。也可以从刺激情境的评估意义方面进行解释。对盲童组中三名儿童的非典型皮肤电导率活动进行了单独考虑。