Pélisson D, Goffart L, Guillaume A
Espace et Action, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 94, Bron, France.
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Sep;80(3):1180-96. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.3.1180.
The implication of the caudal part of the fastigial nucleus (cFN) in the control of saccadic shifts of the visual axis is now well established. In contrast a possible involvement of the rostral part of the fastigial nuceus (rFN) remains unknown. In the current study we investigated in the head-unrestrained cat the contribution of the rFN to the control of visually triggered saccadic gaze shifts by measuring the deficits after unilateral muscimol injection in the rFN. A typical gaze dysmetria was observed: gaze saccades directed toward the inactivated side were hypermetric, whereas those with an opposite direction were hypometric. For both movement directions, gaze dysmetria was proportional to target retinal eccentricity and could be described as a modified gain in the translation of visual signals into eye and head motor commands. Correction saccades were triggered when the target remained visible and reduced the gaze fixation error to 2.7 +/- 1.3 degrees (mean +/- SD) on average. The hypermetria of ipsiversive gaze shifts resulted predominantly from a hypermetric response of the eyes, whereas the hypometria of contraversive gaze shifts resulted from hypometric responses of both eye and head. However, even in this latter case, the eye saccade was more affected than the motion of the head. As a consequence, for both directions of gaze shift the relative contributions of the eye and head to the overall gaze displacement were altered by muscimol injection. This was revealed by a decreased contribution of the head for ipsiversive gaze shifts and an increased head contribution for contraversive movements. These modifications were associated with slight changes in the delay between eye and head movement onsets. Inactivation of the rFN also affected the initiation of eye and head movements. Indeed, the latency of ipsiversive gaze and head movements decreased to 88 and 92% of normal, respectively, whereas the latency of contraversive ones increased to 149 and 145%. The deficits induced by rFN inactivation were then compared with those obtained after muscimol injection in the cFN of the same animals. Several deficits differed according to the site of injection within the fastigial nucleus (tonic orbital eye rotation, hypermetria of ipsiversive gaze shifts and fixation offset, relationship between dysmetria and latency of contraversive gaze shifts, postural deficit). In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that the rFN is involved in the initiation and the control of combined eye-head gaze shifts. In addition our findings support a functional distinction between the rFN and cFN for the control of orienting gaze shifts. This distinction is discussed with respect to the segregated fastigiofugal projections arising from the rFN and cFN.
小脑顶核尾部(cFN)在控制视轴扫视性移动中的作用现已明确。相比之下,小脑顶核头部(rFN)可能的参与情况仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们对头部不受限制的猫进行了研究,通过测量向rFN单侧注射蝇蕈醇后的缺陷,来探究rFN对视觉触发的扫视性注视移动控制的贡献。观察到一种典型的注视测量障碍:指向失活侧的注视扫视过长,而相反方向的扫视过短。对于两个运动方向,注视测量障碍与目标视网膜离心率成正比,并且可以描述为视觉信号转化为眼和头部运动指令过程中的增益改变。当目标保持可见时会触发校正扫视,平均将注视固定误差降低到2.7±1.3度(平均值±标准差)。同侧性注视移动的过长主要是由于眼睛的过长反应,而对侧性注视移动的过短是由于眼睛和头部的过短反应。然而,即使在后一种情况下,眼球扫视比头部运动受影响更大。因此,对于两个注视移动方向,蝇蕈醇注射改变了眼睛和头部对整体注视位移的相对贡献。这表现为同侧性注视移动时头部贡献减少,而对侧性移动时头部贡献增加。这些改变与眼和头部运动起始之间延迟的轻微变化有关。rFN的失活也影响了眼和头部运动的起始。实际上,同侧性注视和头部运动的潜伏期分别降至正常的88%和92%,而对侧性的潜伏期则增加到149%和145%。然后将rFN失活引起的缺陷与在同一动物的cFN注射蝇蕈醇后获得的缺陷进行比较。根据小脑顶核内注射部位的不同,几种缺陷有所不同(紧张性眼眶眼球旋转、同侧性注视移动的过长和注视偏移、对侧性注视移动的测量障碍与潜伏期之间的关系、姿势缺陷)。总之,本研究表明rFN参与了眼-头联合注视移动的起始和控制。此外,我们的研究结果支持rFN和cFN在控制定向注视移动方面的功能差异。结合rFN和cFN发出的分离的小脑顶核传出投射对这种差异进行了讨论。