• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜超声检查对于结直肠癌分期而言是一种可靠且敏感的检查方法吗?一项对比研究。

Is laparoscopic sonography a reliable and sensitive procedure for staging colorectal cancer? A comparative study.

作者信息

Goletti O, Celona G, Galatioto C, Viaggi B, Lippolis P V, Pieri L, Cavina E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56100 Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 1998 Oct;12(10):1236-41. doi: 10.1007/s004649900827.

DOI:10.1007/s004649900827
PMID:9745063
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic colectomy has developed rapidly with the explosion of technology. In most cases, laparoscopic resection is performed for colorectal cancer. Intraoperative staging during laparoscopic procedure is limited. Laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS) represents the only real alternative to manual palpation during laparoscopic surgery.

METHODS

We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of LUS in comparison with preoperative staging and laparoscopy in 33 patients with colorectal cancer. Preoperative staging included abdominal US, CT, and endoscopic US (for rectal cancer). Laparoscopy and LUS were performed in all cases. Pre- and intraoperative staging were related to definitive histology. Staging was done according to the TNM classification.

RESULTS

LUS obtained good results in the evaluation of hepatic metastases, with a sensitivity of 100% versus 62.5% and 75% by preoperative diagnostic means and laparoscopy, respectively. Nodal metastases were diagnosed with a sensitivity of 94% versus 18% with preoperative staging and 6% with laparoscopy, but the method had a low specificity (53%). The therapeutic program was changed thanks to laparoscopy and LUS in 11 cases (33%). In four cases (12%), the planned therapeutic approach was changed after LUS alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained in this study demonstrate that LUS is an accurate and highly sensitive procedure in staging colorectal cancer, providing a useful and reliable diagnostic tool complementary to laparoscopy.

摘要

背景

随着技术的迅猛发展,腹腔镜结肠切除术发展迅速。在大多数情况下,腹腔镜切除术用于治疗结直肠癌。腹腔镜手术中的术中分期受限。腹腔镜超声检查(LUS)是腹腔镜手术中唯一可真正替代手动触诊的方法。

方法

我们评估了33例结直肠癌患者中LUS与术前分期及腹腔镜检查相比的诊断准确性。术前分期包括腹部超声、CT及内镜超声(用于直肠癌)。所有病例均进行了腹腔镜检查和LUS。术前和术中分期与最终组织学结果相关。分期依据TNM分类进行。

结果

LUS在评估肝转移方面取得了良好结果,其敏感性为100%,而术前诊断方法和腹腔镜检查的敏感性分别为62.5%和75%。诊断淋巴结转移的敏感性为94%,术前分期为18%,腹腔镜检查为6%,但该方法特异性较低(53%)。11例(33%)患者因腹腔镜检查和LUS改变了治疗方案。4例(12%)患者仅在LUS检查后改变了计划的治疗方法。

结论

本研究结果表明,LUS在结直肠癌分期中是一种准确且高度敏感的方法,是一种与腹腔镜检查互补的有用且可靠的诊断工具。

相似文献

1
Is laparoscopic sonography a reliable and sensitive procedure for staging colorectal cancer? A comparative study.腹腔镜超声检查对于结直肠癌分期而言是一种可靠且敏感的检查方法吗?一项对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 1998 Oct;12(10):1236-41. doi: 10.1007/s004649900827.
2
Pretherapeutic evaluation of patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer using endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasonography.使用内镜超声和腹腔镜超声对上消化道癌患者进行治疗前评估。
Dan Med J. 2012 Dec;59(12):B4568.
3
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic ultrasonography before laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection.腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术前腹腔镜超声检查的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2017 Oct;104(11):1462-1469. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10636.
4
Laparoscopic sonography in screening metastases from gastrointestinal cancer: comparative accuracy with traditional procedures.腹腔镜超声检查在筛查胃肠道癌转移灶中的应用:与传统检查方法的准确性比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1995 Jun;5(3):176-82.
5
The role of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative staging of patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜和腹腔镜超声在可切除结直肠癌肝转移患者术前分期中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Surg. 2012 Jul;204(1):84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.07.018. Epub 2012 Jan 14.
6
Diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography optimize the staging and resectability of intraabdominal neoplasms.
Surg Endosc. 2001 Sep;15(9):1016-9. doi: 10.1007/s004640080094. Epub 2001 Jun 12.
7
Diagnostic laparoscopy and ultrasonography for colorectal liver metastases.用于结直肠癌肝转移的诊断性腹腔镜检查和超声检查
Scand J Surg. 2006;95(3):172-5. doi: 10.1177/145749690609500308.
8
Selection of patients for resection of colorectal metastases to the liver using diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography.使用诊断性腹腔镜检查和腹腔镜超声检查选择适合切除结直肠癌肝转移灶的患者。
Ann Surg. 1999 Jul;230(1):31-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199907000-00005.
9
TNM staging and assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer by laparoscopic ultrasonography.胰腺癌的TNM分期及腹腔镜超声对可切除性的评估
Surg Endosc. 1999 Oct;13(10):967-71. doi: 10.1007/s004649901148.
10
[Hepatic metastases disclosed by laparoscopy and echographic laparoscopy. Impact of ultrasound-guided biopsy].腹腔镜检查和超声腹腔镜检查发现的肝转移瘤。超声引导下活检的影响
Ann Chir. 1997;51(4):318-25.

引用本文的文献

1
Intraoperative Ultrasound as a Screening Modality for the Detection of Liver Metastases during Resection of Primary Colorectal Cancer - A Systematic Review.术中超声作为原发性结直肠癌切除术中检测肝转移的筛查方式——一项系统评价
Ultrasound Int Open. 2017 Apr;3(2):E60-E68. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-100503. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
2
Novel 3-D laparoscopic magnetic ultrasound image guidance for lesion targeting.新型三维腹腔镜磁超声图像引导的病灶靶向。
HPB (Oxford). 2010 Dec;12(10):709-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00244.x.
3
The role of staging laparoscopy for intraabdominal cancers: an evidence-based review.
分期腹腔镜检查在腹内癌症中的作用:一项基于证据的综述。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Feb;23(2):231-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0099-2. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
4
Value of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography in determining resectability of colorectal hepatic metastases.腹腔镜检查及腹腔镜超声检查在判定结直肠癌肝转移可切除性中的价值
HPB (Oxford). 2003;5(2):100-4. doi: 10.1080/13651820310000046.
5
The role of echo-laparoscopy in abdominal surgery: five years' experience in a dedicated center.超声腹腔镜在腹部手术中的作用:在一个专业中心的五年经验
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jan;22(1):112-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9382-x. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
6
Diagnostic laparoscopy: indications and benefits.诊断性腹腔镜检查:适应证与益处
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005 Jun;390(3):187-96. doi: 10.1007/s00423-004-0483-x. Epub 2004 May 20.