Suppr超能文献

国产塑料食管内支架的内镜置入——在可扩张金属支架时代它仍有作用吗?一项针对265例连续患者的前瞻性印度研究。

Endoscopic placement of indigenous plastic esophageal endoprostheses--does it still have a role in the era of expandable metallic stents? A prospective Indian study in 265 consecutive patients.

作者信息

Maydeo A P, Bapaye A, Desai P N, Khanna S S, Deshpande R K, Badve R

机构信息

SMS Endoscopy Centre, Bhatia General Hospital, Mumbai (Bombay), India.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 1998 Aug;30(6):532-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1001339.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Esophageal endoprosthesis placement is an established method of palliating inoperable esophageal malignancy. However, the prosthesis choice varies, with expandable metal stents recently gaining popularity. We present our experience of using an indigenously developed plastic prosthesis in 265 patients prospectively in the period April 1992 to May 1996.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An indigenous endoprosthesis made of a medical grade, nontoxic, radiopaque plastic material was placed successfully in 259 patients after serial dilatation of the malignant stricture. Patients were followed up once every month for at least 6 months and also in between if they developed any significant symptoms. The results were analyzed prospectively with special emphasis on the cost of the therapy, technical success of placement, improvement of swallowing and occurrence of complications.

RESULTS

The technical success of placement was 97.7% (259/265 patients). The mean dysphagia score improved from 3.2 to 1.2; 212 patients (81.8%) could swallow semisolids whereas 47 patients (18.2%) could swallow liquids. Though 75 patients (28.3%) had an associated tracheoesophageal fistula and 29.8% had received prior radiotherapy/chemotherapy, immediate complications like perforation, respiratory distress or severe hemorrhage were encountered in only 4.3% of patients. Late complications occurred in 12.7% and 32.8% of the patients complained of mild post-procedure pain in the chest. The overall procedure-related mortality was 3.9%. The average cost of the prosthesis was only US$ 15 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Placement of a plastic prosthesis is still a very effective and safe method for relief of malignancy-induced dysphagia. The associated complications can be significantly reduced by modifying the prosthesis material/design and adhering to a careful technique. The extremely low cost of the prosthesis and its safety profile makes this treatment highly cost-effective and widely applicable in developing countries such as India.

摘要

背景与研究目的

食管内支架置入术是缓解无法手术切除的食管恶性肿瘤的一种成熟方法。然而,支架的选择各不相同,近年来可扩张金属支架越来越受欢迎。我们介绍了1992年4月至1996年5月期间对265例患者前瞻性使用国产塑料支架的经验。

患者与方法

在对恶性狭窄进行系列扩张后,将一种由医用级、无毒、不透射线的塑料材料制成的国产内支架成功置入259例患者体内。患者每月随访一次,至少随访6个月,若出现任何严重症状则随时随访。对结果进行前瞻性分析,特别关注治疗成本、置入技术成功率、吞咽改善情况及并发症的发生。

结果

置入技术成功率为97.7%(259/265例患者)。吞咽困难平均评分从3.2改善至1.2;212例患者(81.8%)能够吞咽半固体食物,47例患者(18.2%)能够吞咽液体。尽管75例患者(28.3%)伴有气管食管瘘,29.8%的患者曾接受过放疗/化疗,但仅4.3%的患者出现穿孔、呼吸窘迫或严重出血等即刻并发症。12.7%的患者出现晚期并发症,32.8%的患者主诉术后胸部有轻度疼痛。总体手术相关死亡率为3.9%。每个患者使用支架的平均成本仅为15美元。

结论

置入塑料支架仍然是缓解恶性肿瘤所致吞咽困难的一种非常有效且安全的方法。通过改进支架材料/设计并严格遵循精细技术,可显著减少相关并发症。支架成本极低及其安全性使其成为一种性价比极高的治疗方法,在印度等发展中国家具有广泛的适用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验