Velmahos G C, Demetriades D, Cornwell E E
Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
World J Surg. 1998 Oct;22(10):1034-8. doi: 10.1007/s002689900512.
Mandatory exploration is the standard method for managing patients with gunshot wounds to the abdomen and back. This policy is associated with a high incidence of unnecessary laparotomies and significant morbidity. Reports from our center have shown that a policy of selective management, based on clinical findings, is safe in such patients. Patients with bullet trajectories that carry a high likelihood for intraabdominal organ injury may constitute a subgroup at particular risk. The need for routine or selective exploration in similar patients must be assessed. Therefore we decided to analyze patients with transpelvic gunshot wounds. The objective of the study was to examine if a policy of selective management of patients with transpelvic gunshot wounds is safe. This prospective study was conducted at an academic level I trauma center. We admitted 37 patients with transpelvic gunshot wounds over a 12-month period. All patients were managed according to a protocol that dictated laparotomy in the presence of significant clinical findings (peritoneal signs, hemodynamic instability, gross hematuria, rectal bleeding) and observation in the absence of the above. Additional diagnostic workup was performed only in appropriate cases rather than routinely. Nineteen (51.3%) patients were immediately operated on the basis of clinical findings. Sixteen of these laparotomies were therapeutic. Eighteen (48.6%) patients were initially observed. Subsequently, three of them underwent exploration for development of abdominal tenderness. All three laparotomies were nontherapeutic. The remaining 15 (40.5%) patients were successfully managed nonoperatively. There were no delays in diagnosis or missed injuries. Clinical examination had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 71.4% in detecting the need for laparotomy. A policy of selective management is thus safe, even for patients who suffer gunshot wounds with a high likelihood for intraabdominal organ injury. Clinical examination, supported by additional studies in appropriate cases, is the main method of selecting patients for operation or nonoperative treatment.
强制探查是处理腹部和背部枪伤患者的标准方法。这一策略与不必要剖腹手术的高发生率及显著的发病率相关。我们中心的报告显示,基于临床发现的选择性处理策略对此类患者是安全的。子弹轨迹提示腹腔内器官损伤可能性高的患者可能构成一个特殊风险亚组。必须评估对类似患者进行常规或选择性探查的必要性。因此,我们决定分析经盆腔枪伤患者。本研究的目的是检验对经盆腔枪伤患者采用选择性处理策略是否安全。这项前瞻性研究在一级学术创伤中心开展。我们在12个月期间收治了37例经盆腔枪伤患者。所有患者均按照一项方案进行处理,该方案规定在出现显著临床发现(腹膜刺激征、血流动力学不稳定、肉眼血尿、直肠出血)时进行剖腹手术,无上述情况时进行观察。仅在适当病例而非常规情况下进行额外的诊断检查。19例(51.3%)患者基于临床发现立即接受手术。其中16例剖腹手术具有治疗意义。18例(48.6%)患者最初接受观察。随后,其中3例因出现腹部压痛而接受探查。所有3例剖腹手术均无治疗意义。其余15例(40.5%)患者非手术治疗成功。诊断无延迟,也没有漏诊损伤。临床检查在检测是否需要剖腹手术方面的敏感性为100%,特异性为71.4%。因此,即使对于腹腔内器官损伤可能性高的枪伤患者,选择性处理策略也是安全的。临床检查在适当病例的额外检查支持下,是选择患者进行手术或非手术治疗的主要方法。