Suppr超能文献

一种针对背部枪伤的选择性治疗方法。

A selective approach to the management of gunshot wounds to the back.

作者信息

Velmahos G C, Demetriades D, Foianini E, Tatevossian R, Cornwell E E, Asensio J, Belzberg H, Berne T V

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Southern California and the Los Angeles County + USC Medical Center, 90033, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1997 Sep;174(3):342-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(97)00098-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gunshot wounds to the back with retroperitoneal trajectories have been traditionally managed under the same guidelines as anterior gunshot wounds. Recent work has suggested that selective nonoperative management of anterior abdominal gunshot wounds is safe. The role of this policy in gunshot wounds to the back, where retroperitoneal organ injuries may be more difficult to detect clinically, has not been investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To examine if selective nonoperative management based on clinical assessment is a safe alternative to mandatory exploration for gunshot wounds to the back.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Large-volume level-1 university affiliated trauma center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred and three consecutive patients with gunshot wounds to the back were managed according to a protocol during a 12-month period. Patients with hemodynamic instability or peritonitis underwent urgent operation. The rest of the patients were observed with careful serial clinical examinations.

RESULTS

Eleven patients underwent an emergency room thoracotomy and were excluded. Four more patients were operated upon, despite the absence of abdominal findings, because of associated spinal cord injuries (2 patients), inability to observe due to need for repair of an associated peripheral vascular injury (1 patient), and participation in another protocol of aggressive evaluation of asymptomatic patients with suspected diaphragmatic injuries (1 patient). Of the remaining 188 patients, 58 (31%) underwent laparotomy (56 therapeutic, 2 negative) and 130 (69%) were initially observed owing to negative clinical examination. Following the development of increasing abdominal tenderness, 4 of these 130 (3%) underwent delayed explorations, which were all nontherapeutic. The sensitivity and specificity of initial clinical examination in detecting significant intraabdominal injuries were 100% and 95%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Mandatory laparotomy is not necessary for gunshot wounds of the back. Clinical examination is a safe method of selecting patients for nonoperative management. An observation period of 24 hours is adequate for patients with no abdominal symptoms.

摘要

背景

传统上,伴有腹膜后弹道的背部枪伤与腹部前侧枪伤遵循相同的治疗原则。近期研究表明,腹部前侧枪伤的选择性非手术治疗是安全的。但该策略在背部枪伤中的作用尚未得到研究,因为腹膜后器官损伤在临床上可能更难被发现。

目的

探讨基于临床评估的选择性非手术治疗是否是背部枪伤强制探查的安全替代方案。

设计

前瞻性研究。

地点

大型一级大学附属创伤中心。

患者和方法

在12个月期间,按照方案对203例连续的背部枪伤患者进行治疗。血流动力学不稳定或发生腹膜炎的患者接受急诊手术。其余患者通过仔细的系列临床检查进行观察。

结果

11例患者接受了急诊室开胸手术并被排除。另有4例患者尽管未发现腹部异常,但因合并脊髓损伤(2例)、因需要修复相关外周血管损伤而无法观察(1例)以及参与另一项对疑似膈肌损伤的无症状患者进行积极评估的方案(1例)而接受了手术。在其余188例患者中,58例(31%)接受了剖腹手术(56例治疗性手术,2例阴性手术),130例(69%)因临床检查阴性而最初接受观察。在这130例患者中,有4例(3%)在出现腹部压痛加重后接受了延迟探查,均为非治疗性手术。初始临床检查检测严重腹腔内损伤的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和95%。

结论

背部枪伤无需强制进行剖腹手术。临床检查是选择非手术治疗患者的安全方法。对于没有腹部症状的患者,24小时的观察期就足够了。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验