• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统与微芯片控制的经股骨截肢者气动摆动相控制:用户评价

Conventional versus microchip controlled pneumatic swing phase control for trans-femoral amputees: user's verdict.

作者信息

Datta D, Howitt J

机构信息

Mobility and Specialised Rehabilitation Centre, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, England.

出版信息

Prosthet Orthot Int. 1998 Aug;22(2):129-35. doi: 10.3109/03093649809164474.

DOI:10.3109/03093649809164474
PMID:9747997
Abstract

A questionnaire survey of 22 selected transfemoral amputees who were switched from pneumatic swing phase control knee joints (PSPC) to microprocessor controlled intelligent knee joints (IP) is presented. On overall rating all respondents considered the IP to be an improvement or a great improvement compared to the PSPC and none decided to revert back or wished to use their previous PSPC prosthesis on a regular basis. However the IP was not rated to be superior in every area of the questionnaire. Walking at different speeds, walking further, reduction of energy consumption were the main areas where subjective improvements were perceived by the amputees themselves. It is strongly believed that patients' own views should be an important and integral part of the evaluation of new prosthetic technology.

摘要

本文介绍了一项针对22名选定的经股截肢者的问卷调查,这些截肢者从气动摆动期控制膝关节(PSPC)转换为微处理器控制的智能膝关节(IP)。在总体评分中,所有受访者都认为与PSPC相比,IP有改进或有很大改进,没有人决定换回原来的产品,也没有人希望定期使用他们以前的PSPC假肢。然而,在问卷的各个方面,IP并没有被评为优于PSPC。截肢者自身认为,在不同速度行走、行走更远的距离以及降低能耗等主要方面有主观上的改善。人们坚信,患者自己的观点应该是新假肢技术评估的重要组成部分。

相似文献

1
Conventional versus microchip controlled pneumatic swing phase control for trans-femoral amputees: user's verdict.传统与微芯片控制的经股骨截肢者气动摆动相控制:用户评价
Prosthet Orthot Int. 1998 Aug;22(2):129-35. doi: 10.3109/03093649809164474.
2
A comparative evaluation of oxygen consumption and gait pattern in amputees using Intelligent Prostheses and conventionally damped knee swing-phase control.使用智能假肢和传统阻尼膝关节摆动期控制对截肢者的耗氧量和步态模式进行比较评估。
Clin Rehabil. 2005 Jun;19(4):398-403. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr805oa.
3
Successful prosthetic fitting of elderly trans-femoral amputees with Intelligent Prosthesis (IP): a clinical pilot study.老年经股骨截肢者使用智能假肢(IP)的成功假肢适配:一项临床试点研究。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007 Sep;31(3):271-6. doi: 10.1080/03093640601040152.
4
The comparison of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor- controlled prosthetic knee under different walking speeds: A randomized cross-over trial.不同步行速度下使用机械和微处理器控制的假肢膝关节的经股截肢者的比较:一项随机交叉试验。
Technol Health Care. 2018;26(4):581-592. doi: 10.3233/THC-171157.
5
Energy cost during ambulation in transfemoral amputees: a knee joint with a mechanical swing phase control vs a knee joint with a pneumatic swing phase control.经股截肢者行走时的能量消耗:具有机械摆动期控制的膝关节与具有气动摆动期控制的膝关节的比较。
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995 Jun;27(2):77-81.
6
Energy cost of walking: comparison of "intelligent prosthesis" with conventional mechanism.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Mar;78(3):330-3. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90044-7.
7
Kinematics in the terminal swing phase of unilateral transfemoral amputees: microprocessor-controlled versus swing-phase control prosthetic knees.单侧股骨截肢患者终末摆动期的运动学:微处理器控制与摆动期控制假肢膝关节。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jun;91(6):919-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.01.025.
8
Gait termination on a declined surface in trans-femoral amputees: Impact of using microprocessor-controlled limb system.经股骨截肢者在倾斜表面上的步态终止:使用微处理器控制肢体系统的影响。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2018 Aug;57:35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 May 30.
9
Evaluation of function, performance, and preference as transfemoral amputees transition from mechanical to microprocessor control of the prosthetic knee.作为经股截肢者从机械控制的假肢膝关节过渡到微处理器控制的假肢膝关节时,对其功能、性能和偏好的评估。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Feb;88(2):207-17. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.030.
10
Safety and function of a prototype microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis for low active transfemoral amputees switching from a mechanic knee prosthesis: a pilot study.一款用于从机械膝关节假体转换的低活动水平经股骨截肢者的原型微处理器控制膝关节假体的安全性与功能:一项试点研究。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Feb;13(2):157-165. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1300344. Epub 2017 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
User-relevant factors influencing the prosthesis use of persons with a transfemoral amputation or knee-disarticulation: A meta-synthesis of qualitative literature and focus group results.影响股骨截肢或膝关节离断者使用假肢的与使用者相关的因素:定性文献和焦点小组结果的元综合分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 17;18(1):e0276874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276874. eCollection 2023.
2
Measures and procedures utilized to determine the added value of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joints: a systematic review.用于确定微处理器控制的假肢膝关节附加值的测量和程序:系统评价。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Nov 27;14:333. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-333.
3
Energy expenditure and activity of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees.
使用机械和微处理器控制的假肢膝关节的经股骨截肢者的能量消耗与活动情况。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jul;89(7):1380-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.053.