Gammon J
Swansea Institute of Higher Education, Faculty of Humanities Education and Healthcare, United Kingdom.
Int J Nurs Pract. 1998 Jun;4(2):84-96. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-172x.1998.00084.x.
This quantitative research has attempted to investigate the psychological effects of hospitalisation and source isolation, and assessed whether were they influential in affecting a patient's cognitive coping with these two stressors. The research evaluated whether isolating a person because of an infection was a more stressful event (causing negative effects on four measured psychological constructs) than routine hospital admission. The research was conducted in two large District General Hospitals and one elderly care hospital. Individuals admitted to one of the research sites, and who satisfied the sample criteria, were adopted. The total number of subjects was 40. The research design was quasi experimental (post test only control group design), using a quantitative approach. Following a period of hospitalisation or isolation subjects in the control group (Group 1, hospitalised subjects n = 20) and subjects in the experimental group (Group 2, isolated subjects, n = 20) were given the following to complete: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Health Illness (Powerlessness) Questionnaire, and the Self Esteem Scale. These measured four psychological constructs: anxiety, depression, self esteem and sense of control. The quantitative data generated were analysed using descriptive statistics and the Student's t-test. The findings confirmed and validated previous research that hospitalisation results in many negative feelings that have detrimental effects on psychological well being and coping. However, more significantly, infected subjects who were isolated demonstrated feelings of anxiety, and depression that were significantly higher, and feelings of self esteem and sense of control that were significantly lower than those demonstrated by hospitalised subjects. Thus it could be argued that isolation has an even greater negative effect on their coping. Further research therefore needs to examine how specific nurse interventions can ameliorate the identified negative effects of isolation and so facilitate effective coping and positive psychological well being.
这项定量研究试图调查住院治疗和源头隔离的心理影响,并评估它们是否对患者应对这两种压力源的认知产生影响。该研究评估了因感染而隔离一个人是否比常规住院更具压力(对四种测量的心理结构产生负面影响)。研究在两家大型综合医院和一家老年护理医院进行。选取了入住其中一个研究地点且符合样本标准的个体。受试者总数为40人。研究设计为准实验性(仅后测对照组设计),采用定量方法。在一段住院或隔离期后,对照组(第1组,住院受试者n = 20)和实验组(第2组,隔离受试者,n = 20)的受试者被要求完成以下内容:医院焦虑抑郁量表、健康疾病(无力感)问卷和自尊量表。这些量表测量了四种心理结构:焦虑、抑郁、自尊和控制感。对生成的定量数据进行了描述性统计分析和学生t检验。研究结果证实并验证了先前的研究,即住院会导致许多负面情绪,对心理健康和应对产生不利影响。然而,更显著的是,被隔离的感染受试者表现出的焦虑和抑郁情绪明显更高,自尊和控制感明显低于住院受试者。因此,可以认为隔离对他们的应对有更大的负面影响。因此,进一步的研究需要考察具体的护士干预措施如何减轻已确定的隔离负面影响,从而促进有效应对和积极的心理健康。