Knopp R H, Alagona P, Davidson M, Goldberg A C, Kafonek S D, Kashyap M, Sprecher D, Superko H R, Jenkins S, Marcovina S
Northwest Lipid Research Clinic, University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle 98104, USA.
Metabolism. 1998 Sep;47(9):1097-104. doi: 10.1016/s0026-0495(98)90284-0.
This study compared the efficacy and safety of a once-a-night, time-release niacin formulation, Niaspan (Kos Pharmaceuticals, Miami Lakes, FL), with plain niacin and placebo for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia. The study was conducted in nine academic lipid research clinics in a randomized, double-blind design. Niaspan 1.5 g at bedtime was compared with plain niacin 1.5 g/d after 8 weeks and 3.0 g/d after 16 weeks in divided doses and with placebo. A total of 223 hypercholesterolemic adult men and women participated. Compared with placebo at 8 weeks, Niaspan versus plain niacin at 1.5 g/d showed comparable efficacy, comparably lowering total cholesterol (C) (8%/8%), triglycerides (16%/18%), low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-C (12%/12%), apolipoprotein (apo B) (12%/12%), apo E (9%/7%), and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] (15%/11%), and raising high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-C (20%/17%), HDL2-C (37%/33%), HDL3-C (17%/16%), and apo A-I (8%/6%) (P < or = .05 in all instances). After 16 weeks, the Niaspan effect on LDL-C and triglyceride was unchanged while the plain niacin effect approximately doubled. At equal doses of 1.5 g/d of Niapan versus plain niacin, respectively, AST increased 5.0% versus 4.8% (difference not significant [NS]), fasting plasma glucose increased 4.8% versus 4.5% (NS), and uric acid concentrations increased less, 6% versus 16% (P=.0001). Flushing events were more frequent with plain niacin versus Niaspan (1,905 v 576, P < .001). Flushing severity was slightly greater with Niaspan, but still well tolerated. In conclusion, Niaspan 1.5 g hour of sleep (hs) has comparable efficacy, a lower incidence of flushing, a lesser uric acid rise, and an equivalent hepatic enzyme effect than 500 mg thrice-daily plain niacin in hyperlipidemic subjects. Niaspan may be an equivalent or better alternative to plain niacin at moderate doses in the management of hyperlipidemia.
本研究比较了每晚一次的缓释烟酸制剂Niaspan(科斯制药公司,迈阿密湖,佛罗里达州)与普通烟酸及安慰剂治疗原发性高胆固醇血症的疗效和安全性。该研究在9个学术性脂质研究诊所采用随机、双盲设计进行。将睡前服用1.5g Niaspan与分剂量服用普通烟酸8周后每日1.5g、16周后每日3.0g以及与安慰剂进行比较。共有223名高胆固醇血症成年男性和女性参与。与8周时的安慰剂相比,Niaspan与每日1.5g普通烟酸显示出相当的疗效,总胆固醇(C)降低程度相当(8%/8%)、甘油三酯(16%/18%)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)-C(12%/12%)、载脂蛋白(apo)B(12%/12%)、apo E(9%/7%)和脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)](15%/11%),高密度脂蛋白(HDL)-C升高程度相当(20%/17%)、HDL2-C(37%/33%)、HDL3-C(17%/16%)和apo A-I(8%/6%)(所有情况下P≤0.05)。16周后,Niaspan对LDL-C和甘油三酯的作用未变,而普通烟酸的作用约增加一倍。分别给予等量的每日1.5g Niaspan和普通烟酸时,谷草转氨酶(AST)升高5.0%对4.8%(差异无统计学意义[NS]),空腹血糖升高4.8%对4.5%(NS),尿酸浓度升高较少,6%对16%(P = 0.0001)。普通烟酸引起的潮红事件比Niaspan更频繁(1905次对576次,P < 0.001)。Niaspan引起的潮红严重程度略高,但仍耐受性良好。总之,在高脂血症患者中,与每日三次500mg普通烟酸相比,睡前服用1.5g Niaspan具有相当的疗效、较低的潮红发生率、较小的尿酸升高以及相当的肝酶效应。在高脂血症管理中,中等剂量的Niaspan可能是普通烟酸的等效或更好替代药物。