• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹股沟疝治疗的医学经济学评估:Shouldice法与腹腔镜手术对比

[Medico-economic evaluation of treatment of inguinal hernia: Shouldice vs. laparoscopy].

作者信息

Damamme A, Samama G, D'Alche-Gautier M J, Chanavel N, Bréfort J L, Le Roux Y

机构信息

Service de Chirurgie Générale Viscérale et Digestive, CHU Côte de Nacre, Caen.

出版信息

Ann Chir. 1998;52(1):11-6.

PMID:9752402
Abstract

Between May 1994 and September 1995, 64 men were included in a randomized prospective study comparing conventional Shouldice repair (S group) and transperitoneal laparoscopic repair with polypropylene mesh (L group). Cost evaluation was divided into distinct parts: drugs, non usable surgical materials, medico-technical procedures food and employees costs. In group S, mean operating time was 56', total cost was 3,922 FF in the case of unilateral hernia and 4,808 FF and respectively 77' in the case of bilateral hernia. In group L, mean operative time was 89', total cost 8,949 FF (disposable trocars) and 7,136 FF (non-disposable trocars) in the case of unilateral hernia and 116', 9,570 FF and 7,763 FF in case of bilateral hernia. Postoperative stay was 4.2 days in group S and 4 days in group L. Return to work was 28.6 days in group L and 35.5 days in group S (ns). In conclusion laparoscopic hernia repair does not decrease post operative pain, hospital stay and return to work, but is twice as expensive.

摘要

1994年5月至1995年9月期间,64名男性被纳入一项随机前瞻性研究,比较传统的Shouldice修补术(S组)和经腹腹腔镜聚丙烯网片修补术(L组)。成本评估分为不同部分:药物、不可用手术材料、医疗技术程序、食品和员工成本。在S组中,单侧疝的平均手术时间为56分钟,总成本为3922法郎;双侧疝的平均手术时间为77分钟,总成本为4808法郎。在L组中,单侧疝的平均手术时间为89分钟,使用一次性套管针时总成本为8949法郎,使用非一次性套管针时总成本为7136法郎;双侧疝的平均手术时间为116分钟,使用一次性套管针时总成本为9570法郎,使用非一次性套管针时总成本为7763法郎。S组的术后住院时间为4.2天,L组为4天。L组的复工时间为28.6天,S组为35.5天(无显著性差异)。总之,腹腔镜疝修补术不会减少术后疼痛、住院时间和复工时间,但成本是传统修补术的两倍。

相似文献

1
[Medico-economic evaluation of treatment of inguinal hernia: Shouldice vs. laparoscopy].腹股沟疝治疗的医学经济学评估:Shouldice法与腹腔镜手术对比
Ann Chir. 1998;52(1):11-6.
2
[Laparoscopy versus the Shouldice intervention in the treatment of unilateral inguinal hernia: can the operative surcosts be minimized?].[腹腔镜手术与Shouldice手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝:手术成本能否降至最低?]
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1998 Dec;22(12):1061-4.
3
[Prospective controlled study comparing laparoscopy and the Shouldice technique in the treatment of unilateral inguinal hernia].[比较腹腔镜手术与Shouldice技术治疗单侧腹股沟疝的前瞻性对照研究]
Ann Chir. 1996;50(9):776-81.
4
Total costs of laparoscopic and lichtenstein inguinal hernia repairs: a randomized prospective study.腹腔镜与李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术的总成本:一项随机前瞻性研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997 Feb;7(1):1-5.
5
Surgical outcome and cost-minimisation-analyses of laparoscopic and open hernia repair: a randomised prospective trial with one year follow up.
Eur J Surg. 1997 Jul;163(7):505-10.
6
Simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernias: a prospective, randomized study of single versus double mesh laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair.双侧腹股沟疝同期修补:单网片与双网片腹腔镜完全腹膜外修补的前瞻性随机研究
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006 Feb;16(1):12-7. doi: 10.1097/01.sle.0000202195.51699.63.
7
Randomised study of Lichtenstein compared with Shouldice inguinal hernia repair by surgeons in training.实习外科医生对利chtenstein手术与Shouldice腹股沟疝修补术进行的随机研究。
Eur J Surg. 1999 Jan;165(1):49-53. doi: 10.1080/110241599750007504.
8
[Tension-free laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair].[无张力腹腔镜与开放腹股沟疝修补术]
Minerva Chir. 2004 Aug;59(4):369-77.
9
Comparison of Shouldice and Lichtenstein repair for treatment of primary inguinal hernia.Shouldice法与Lichtenstein修补术治疗原发性腹股沟疝的比较。
Acta Chir Belg. 2004 Aug;104(4):418-21.
10
Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜完全腹膜外修补术与开放式李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术的随机对照研究
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jun;17(6):850-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8575-6. Epub 2003 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
International guidelines for groin hernia management.腹股沟疝治疗的国际指南。
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
2
Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.内镜技术与Shouldice及其他开放式无网片技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2005 May;19(5):605-15. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9049-9. Epub 2005 Mar 28.
3
Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.
腹腔镜技术与开放技术用于腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD001785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785.
4
Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.使用合成补片修复腹股沟疝:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Ann Surg. 2002 Mar;235(3):322-32. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200203000-00003.