Suppr超能文献

为南非儿童确定医疗保健优先事项时存在的紧张关系。

Tensions in setting health care priorities for South Africa's children.

作者信息

Landman W A, Henley L D

机构信息

East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1998 Aug;24(4):268-73. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.4.268.

Abstract

The new South African constitution commits the government to guarantee "basic health services" for every child under 18. Primary health care for pregnant women and children under six and elements of essential primary health care have received priority. At present, there is little analysis of the moral considerations involved in making choices about more advanced or costly health care which may, arguably, also be "basic". This paper illustrates some of the tensions in setting priorities for a just macro-allocation of children's health care, given the realities of need and scarce resources, and the commitment to equality of basic opportunities.

摘要

新的南非宪法要求政府为每位18岁以下儿童保障“基本医疗服务”。孕妇和6岁以下儿童的初级医疗保健以及基本初级医疗保健的要素已得到优先考虑。目前,对于在选择可能也可被视为“基本”的更先进或成本更高的医疗保健时所涉及的道德考量,几乎没有分析。鉴于需求现实和资源稀缺,以及对基本机会平等的承诺,本文阐述了在为儿童医疗保健进行公正的宏观分配设定优先次序时存在的一些矛盾。

相似文献

4
5
Justice and solidarity in priority setting in health care.医疗保健资源分配中的公平与团结
Health Care Anal. 2003 Dec;11(4):325-43. doi: 10.1023/B:HCAN.0000010061.71961.87.
6
[Democratic institutional design in health care priority setting and rationing].[医疗保健资源分配优先级设定与配给中的民主制度设计]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
10
Problematic notions in Dutch health care package decisions.荷兰医疗保健套餐决策中的问题观念。
Health Care Anal. 2003 Dec;11(4):287-94. doi: 10.1023/B:HCAN.0000010057.43321.b2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验