• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Clarion 1.2型人工耳蜗的磁共振成像兼容性测试

Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility testing of the Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.

作者信息

Weber B P, Goldring J E, Santogrossi T, Koestler H, Tziviskos G, Battmer R, Lenarz T h

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Otol. 1998 Sep;19(5):584-90.

PMID:9752965
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the compatibility of the Clarion 1.2 magnet-containing cochlear implant with a 1.5-tesla (T) and 0.3-T magnetic resonance imager.

BACKGROUND

Cochlear implants restore functional hearing to patients with sensorineural deafness. With the rapidly increasing number of patients with cochlear implants, there is a need to investigate the implant's magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatibility.

METHODS

The authors tested the potential torque and force on the metallic components of the implant, heating of the implant and surrounding tissue, unintentional output, implant damage, and image distortion. Tests were performed in both a 1.5-T and 0.3-T MRI.

RESULTS

The torque experienced by the implant in the 1.5-T MRI (0.19 nm) was large enough that it could potentially cause implant movement in some patients. An acceptable amount of torque (0.04 nm) was found in the 0.3-T MRI. Image distortion occurred in the area directly around the implant with a radius of up to 60 mm in the 1.5-T MRI and 100 mm in the 0.3-T MRI. In both MRI units, there was no detectable temperature increase or unintentional output. There was no implant damage except that with worst-case conditions, the internal magnet was demagnetized by 78.5% with the 1.5-T unit and 3.36% with the 0.3-T unit.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors recommend patients with cochlear implants avoid imaging in a 1.5-T MRI. The results suggest that the 0.3-T MRI poses little or no risks to patients with cochlear implants.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查Clarion 1.2含磁铁人工耳蜗与1.5特斯拉(T)和0.3 T磁共振成像仪的兼容性。

背景

人工耳蜗可恢复感音神经性聋患者的功能性听力。随着人工耳蜗植入患者数量的迅速增加,有必要研究该植入物的磁共振成像(MRI)兼容性。

方法

作者测试了植入物金属部件上的潜在扭矩和力、植入物及周围组织的发热情况、意外输出、植入物损坏以及图像失真。测试在1.5 T和0.3 T MRI中均进行。

结果

在1.5 T MRI中,植入物所受扭矩(0.19纳米)足够大,在某些患者中可能导致植入物移动。在0.3 T MRI中发现了可接受的扭矩量(0.04纳米)。在1.5 T MRI中,植入物周围半径达60毫米的区域以及在0.3 T MRI中半径达100毫米的区域出现了图像失真。在两个MRI设备中,均未检测到温度升高或意外输出。除了在最坏情况下,1.5 T设备使内部磁铁退磁78.5%,0.3 T设备使内部磁铁退磁3.36%外,未发生植入物损坏。

结论

作者建议人工耳蜗植入患者避免在1.5 T MRI中进行成像。结果表明,0.3 T MRI对人工耳蜗植入患者几乎不构成风险或无风险。

相似文献

1
Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility testing of the Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.Clarion 1.2型人工耳蜗的磁共振成像兼容性测试
Am J Otol. 1998 Sep;19(5):584-90.
2
Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and safety of the SOUNDTEC Direct System.SOUNDTEC Direct系统的磁共振成像兼容性与安全性
Laryngoscope. 2006 Aug;116(8):1321-33. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000230479.39551.4a.
3
Evaluation of MRI compatibility of the modified nucleus multichannel auditory brainstem and cochlear implants.改良型核多通道听觉脑干植入物和人工耳蜗的磁共振成像兼容性评估
Am J Otol. 1996 Sep;17(5):724-9.
4
Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on internal magnet strength in Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implants.磁共振成像对美迪乐Combi 40+型人工耳蜗内部磁体强度的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2004 Aug;114(8):1355-61. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200408000-00007.
5
Safety study of the Cochlear Nucleus 24 device with internal magnet in the 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner.1.5特斯拉磁共振成像扫描仪中带有内置磁体的人工耳蜗核24型装置的安全性研究。
Laryngoscope. 2006 Jun;116(6):865-71. doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000216807.03225.CE.
6
Safety of orthopedic implants in magnetic resonance imaging: an experimental verification.骨科植入物在磁共振成像中的安全性:实验验证
J Orthop Res. 2006 Sep;24(9):1799-802. doi: 10.1002/jor.20213.
7
Cochlear implant magnet displacement during magnetic resonance imaging.磁共振成像期间人工耳蜗磁铁移位
Otol Neurotol. 2008 Sep;29(6):789-190. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181825695.
8
Finite volume analysis of temperature effects induced by active MRI implants: 2. Defects on active MRI implants causing hot spots.有源MRI植入物引起的温度效应的有限体积分析:2. 有源MRI植入物上导致热点的缺陷。
Biomed Eng Online. 2006 May 26;5:35. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-5-35.
9
Demagnetization of cochlear implants and temperature changes in 3.0T MRI environment.人工耳蜗在3.0T磁共振成像环境中的去磁作用及温度变化
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Dec;139(6):833-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.07.026.
10
Biomechanical influences of magnetic resonance imaging on the SOUNDTEC Direct System implant.磁共振成像对SOUNDTEC Direct系统植入物的生物力学影响。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Dec;127(6):520-30. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2002.129895.

引用本文的文献

1
Stereotactic radiosurgery does not appear to impact cochlear implant performance in patients with neurofibromatosis type II.立体定向放射外科手术似乎不会影响Ⅱ型神经纤维瘤病患者的人工耳蜗植入效果。
J Radiosurg SBRT. 2017;5(1):63-71.
2
[Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with magnetic hearing implants: overview and procedural management].[磁听觉植入患者的磁共振成像:概述与程序管理]
Radiologe. 2013 Nov;53(11):1026-32. doi: 10.1007/s00117-013-2570-x.
3
Cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and patients with vestibular schwannoma in the only hearing ear.
2型神经纤维瘤病患者及仅存听力耳患有前庭神经鞘瘤患者的人工耳蜗植入术
Int J Otolaryngol. 2012;2012:157497. doi: 10.1155/2012/157497. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
4
Artifacts caused by cochlear implants with non-removable magnets in 3T MRI: phantom and cadaveric studies.3T MRI 中不可移除磁铁的人工耳蜗引起的伪影:体模和尸体研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Dec;266(12):1885-90. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-0994-8. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
5
Magnetic resonance imaging with the Digisonic SP Neurelec cochlear implant.使用Digisonic SP Neurelec人工耳蜗的磁共振成像。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Sep;265(9):1043-6. doi: 10.1007/s00405-007-0576-6. Epub 2008 Feb 23.
6
Electrode insertion depth in cochlear implantees estimated during surgery, on plain film radiographs and with electrode function testing.通过手术、普通X线平片及电极功能测试评估人工耳蜗植入者的电极插入深度。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2003 Nov;260(10):536-40. doi: 10.1007/s00405-003-0593-z. Epub 2003 May 23.