Råberg L, Grahn M, Hasselquist D, Svensson E
Department of Animal Ecology, Lund University, Sweden.
Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Sep 7;265(1406):1637-41. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0482.
We approach the field of stress immunology from an ecological point of view and ask: why should a heavy physical workload, for example as a result of a high reproductive effort, compromise immune function? We argue that immunosuppression by neuroendocrine mechanisms, such as stress hormones, during heavy physical workload is adaptive, and consider two different ultimate explanations of such immunosuppression. First, several authors have suggested that the immune system is suppressed to reallocate resources to other metabolic demands. In our view, this hypothesis assumes that considerable amounts of energy or nutrients can be saved by suppressing the immune system; however, this assumption requires further investigation. Second, we suggest an alternative explanation based on the idea that the immune system is tightly regulated by neuroendocrine mechanisms to avoid hyperactivation and ensuing autoimmune responses. We hypothesize that the risk of autoimmune responses increases during heavy physical workload and that the immune system is suppressed to counteract this.
我们从生态学角度探讨应激免疫学领域,并提出疑问:为何诸如因高繁殖投入导致的繁重体力劳动会损害免疫功能?我们认为,在繁重体力劳动期间,由神经内分泌机制(如应激激素)介导的免疫抑制具有适应性,并考虑了对这种免疫抑制的两种不同的终极解释。首先,几位作者提出免疫系统受到抑制是为了将资源重新分配到其他代谢需求。在我们看来,这一假设认为通过抑制免疫系统可以节省大量能量或营养物质;然而,这一假设需要进一步研究。其次,我们基于免疫系统受神经内分泌机制严格调控以避免过度激活及随之而来的自身免疫反应这一观点,提出另一种解释。我们假设在繁重体力劳动期间自身免疫反应的风险会增加,免疫系统受到抑制是为了抵消这种情况。