• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工瓣膜心内膜炎手术后的30天死亡率和长期生存率:来自英国心脏瓣膜登记处的一项研究

Thirty-day mortality and long-term survival following surgery for prosthetic endocarditis: a study from the UK heart valve registry.

作者信息

Edwards M B, Ratnatunga C P, Dore C J, Taylor K M

机构信息

United Kingdom Heart Valve Registry, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998 Aug;14(2):156-64. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(98)00148-1.

DOI:10.1016/s1010-7940(98)00148-1
PMID:9755001
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the 30-day mortality, long-term survival and freedom from reoperation following surgery for prosthetic endocarditis (PVE).

METHOD

A retrospective analysis of data from the UK Heart Valve Registry of 322 patients who had undergone single mechanical/bioprosthetic valve replacement for PVE between 1 January 1986 and 31 December 1996. The mean age was 54.9 +/- 12.8 years and 213 (66.1%) were males. There were 170 aortic and 152 mitral valve implantations. Eighty-five (26%) of the infected valves were bioprosthetic and 237 (74%) were mechanical. Of the new prostheses implanted 53 (17%) were bioprosthetic and 269 (83%) were mechanical. Of those with infected bioprostheses, 50 (15.2%) had mechanical valves at redo surgery, whilst 219 (68.3%) of infected mechanical prostheses were re-replaced by mechanical prostheses. The follow-up was 98% complete with a total of 1084.9 patient years.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality was 63 (19.9%; 95%CI 15.9-24.7%). There were 85 late deaths. One, 5 and 10 year survival rates were 67.1% (61.6-72.0%), 55.0% (49.0-60.7%) and 37.6% (27.9-47.2%), respectively. Age was the only significant determinant of 30-day mortality (P = 0.04). Age (P = 0.001) and explanting of infected bioprosthesis and replacement by mechanical valve (P = 0.04) determined long-term survival (P = 0.001). The incidence of re-reoperation was 9.9%. Freedom from reoperation for PVE was 88.4, 87.3 and 87.3% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively. Explanting of bioprosthesis and replacement by mechanical valve (P < 0.001) and reoperation within 60 days of native valve replacement (P = 0.02) were determinants of reoperation for PVE. Freedom from death or reoperation was 61.1, 50.6 and 34.2% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively. Age (P = 0.003), explanting of bioprosthesis and replacement by mechanical valve (P = 0.002) and the period between prosthetic re-replacement (P = 0.04) determined freedom from death or reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Operation for PVE carries a high 30-day mortality and reduced long-term survival. There is no evidence that type of prosthesis used for re-reoperation determines survival or freedom from re-reoperation.

摘要

目的

评估人工瓣膜心内膜炎(PVE)手术后30天死亡率、长期生存率及再次手术情况。

方法

对英国心脏瓣膜登记处1986年1月1日至1996年12月31日期间322例行单一机械/生物人工瓣膜置换术治疗PVE患者的数据进行回顾性分析。平均年龄为54.9±12.8岁,男性213例(66.1%)。共植入主动脉瓣170个、二尖瓣152个。85个(26%)感染瓣膜为生物瓣,237个(74%)为机械瓣。新植入的人工瓣膜中,53个(17%)为生物瓣,269个(83%)为机械瓣。感染生物瓣患者中,50例(15.2%)在再次手术时植入机械瓣,而219例(68.3%)感染机械瓣患者再次植入机械瓣。随访完整率为98%,总计1084.9患者年。

结果

30天死亡率为63例(19.9%;95%CI 15.9 - 24.7%)。有85例晚期死亡。1年、5年和10年生存率分别为67.1%(61.6 - 72.0%)、55.0%(49.0 - 60.7%)和37.6%(27.9 - 47.2%)。年龄是30天死亡率的唯一显著决定因素(P = 0.04)。年龄(P = 0.001)、感染生物瓣的切除及机械瓣置换(P = 0.04)决定长期生存率(P = 0.001)。再次手术发生率为9.9%。PVE再次手术的无事件生存率在1年、5年和10年分别为88.4%、87.3%和87.3%。生物瓣切除及机械瓣置换(P < 0.001)和自体瓣膜置换后60天内再次手术(P = 0.02)是PVE再次手术的决定因素。1年、5年和10年无死亡或再次手术生存率分别为61.1%、50.6%和34.2%。年龄(P = 0.003)、生物瓣切除及机械瓣置换(P = 0.002)以及人工瓣膜再次置换间隔时间(P = 0.04)决定无死亡或再次手术情况。

结论

PVE手术30天死亡率高且长期生存率降低。没有证据表明再次手术所用人造瓣膜类型决定生存率或再次手术情况。

相似文献

1
Thirty-day mortality and long-term survival following surgery for prosthetic endocarditis: a study from the UK heart valve registry.人工瓣膜心内膜炎手术后的30天死亡率和长期生存率:来自英国心脏瓣膜登记处的一项研究
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998 Aug;14(2):156-64. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(98)00148-1.
2
Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis for surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with infective endocarditis.感染性心内膜炎患者行外科主动脉瓣置换时机械瓣膜与生物瓣膜假体的比较
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Sep 1;29(3):386-392. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz122.
3
Further experience with the "no-react" bioprosthesis in patients with active infective endocarditis: 11-year single center results in 402 patients.“无反应”生物假体在活动性感染性心内膜炎患者中的进一步经验:402例患者的11年单中心研究结果
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Aug;61(5):398-408. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1337903. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
4
Immediate and long-term results of valve replacement for native and prosthetic valve endocarditis.自体瓣膜和人工瓣膜心内膜炎瓣膜置换的近期和远期结果
Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Oct;70(4):1219-23. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01887-7.
5
Surgical treatment of infective mitral valve endocarditis: predictors of early and late outcome.感染性二尖瓣心内膜炎的外科治疗:早期和晚期预后的预测因素
J Heart Valve Dis. 2000 May;9(3):327-34.
6
Mid-term follow-up in patients with Biocor porcine bioprostheses.使用Biocor猪生物假体患者的中期随访
Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Jun;10(3):238-44. doi: 10.1016/s0967-2109(01)00141-7.
7
[The incidence of endocarditis caused by a prosthetic valve and its risk factors].[人工瓣膜所致心内膜炎的发病率及其危险因素]
Orv Hetil. 1989 Apr 9;130(15):765-72.
8
Predictors of recurrence and reoperation for prosthetic valve endocarditis after valve replacement surgery for native valve endocarditis.自体瓣膜心内膜炎瓣膜置换术后人工瓣膜心内膜炎复发及再次手术的预测因素。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Feb;137(2):326-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.08.024. Epub 2008 Oct 23.
9
Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.使用圣犹达医疗生物猪生物假体的17年经验。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2005 Jul;14(4):486-92.
10
Tricuspid valve replacement: UK Heart Valve Registry mid-term results comparing mechanical and biological prostheses.三尖瓣置换术:英国心脏瓣膜注册中心比较机械瓣膜和生物瓣膜的中期结果
Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Dec;66(6):1940-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01183-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Reoperative surgery for early- and late-onset prosthetic valve endocarditis: temporal trends and outcomes.早发性和迟发性人工瓣膜心内膜炎的再次手术:时间趋势和结果
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025 Mar 29;40(4). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf096.
2
Infective Endocarditis: Patient Pathways.感染性心内膜炎:患者诊疗路径
JACC Case Rep. 2021 Nov 15;4(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2021.10.002. eCollection 2022 Jan 5.
3
Ethical Dilemma: Should Continuous Intravenous Drug Use Affect Appropriate Management in Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis?
伦理困境:持续静脉注射毒品是否会影响人工瓣膜心内膜炎的合理治疗?
Cureus. 2020 Jun 5;12(6):e8458. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8458.
4
Higher incidence of perivalvular abscess determines perioperative clinical outcome in patients undergoing surgery for prosthetic valve endocarditis.在因感染性心内膜炎而行心脏瓣膜置换术后的患者中,发生瓣周脓肿的几率较高,决定了围手术期的临床转归。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Feb 3;20(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01338-y.
5
Outcomes of Reoperative Valve Replacement in Patients with Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: A 20-Year Experience.人工瓣膜心内膜炎患者再次行瓣膜置换术的结局:20年经验总结
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Feb;51(1):15-21. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2018.51.1.15. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
6
The prognosis of infective endocarditis treated with biological valves versus mechanical valves: A meta-analysis.生物瓣膜与机械瓣膜治疗感染性心内膜炎的预后:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 13;12(4):e0174519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174519. eCollection 2017.
7
The Cost-Effectiveness of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Patients at Risk of Infective Endocarditis.感染性心内膜炎高危患者抗生素预防的成本效益
Circulation. 2016 Nov 15;134(20):1568-1578. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022047.
8
Surgical treatment of late aortic prosthetic valve endocarditis: 19 years' experience.晚期人工主动脉瓣膜心内膜炎的外科治疗:19年经验
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2014 Jun;11(2):126-31. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2014.43837. Epub 2014 Jun 29.
9
Surgical treatment of aortic valve endocarditis: a 26-year experience.主动脉瓣心内膜炎的外科治疗:26年经验
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2014 Jan-Mar;29(1):16-24. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20140006.
10
Mechanisms of infective endocarditis: pathogen-host interaction and risk states.感染性心内膜炎的发病机制:病原体-宿主相互作用和危险状态。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014 Jan;11(1):35-50. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.174. Epub 2013 Nov 19.