Oberle J, Antoniadis G, Rath S A, Seitz K, Schneider O, Braun V, Kahamba J F, Richter H P
Neurosurgical Department, University of Ulm, Günzburg, Germany.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1998;140(6):527-31. doi: 10.1007/s007010050136.
Fourteen patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries underwent intradural inspection of cervical nerve roots to evaluate radiological and intra-operative electrophysiological findings concerning cervical nerve root avulsion from the spinal cord. Four neurosurgeons of our department assessed independently from each other both myelography and CT-myelography concerning intradural nerve root lesions. Each neurosurgeon assessed a total of 26 cervical nerve roots. Two investigators assessed 6/26 and 2 investigators 7/26 nerve roots falsely concerning ventral or/and dorsal root lesions compared with the findings on intradural inspection (23% and 27% false findings). There was a considerable variance concerning the assessibility and findings among the 4 neurosurgeons. Reconstructive surgery was performed after a mean interval of 6.5 months following trauma and 2 weeks following intradural inspection. After exposure of the brachial plexus and the cervical nerve roots in question via a ventral approach, 13 cervical nerve roots were stimulated electrically close to the neuroforamen and cortical evoked potentials (root-SEPs) were recorded from the contralateral postcentral region. All 5 roots with SEPs were intact (no root lesion) and all 8 roots without SEPs showed interrupted (ventral or/and dorsal) rootlets on intradural inspection. Our results demonstrate that false radiological findings concerning root lesions are possible. Intra-operative root-SEPs seem to be a useful aid for evaluation of cervical nerve root lesions. However, more electrophysiological data are necessary to ascertain, if this modality is able to replace intradural inspection in unclear radiological cases in the future.
14例创伤性臂丛神经损伤患者接受了颈神经根的硬膜内检查,以评估与脊髓颈神经根撕脱相关的影像学和术中电生理检查结果。我们科室的4位神经外科医生彼此独立地评估了硬膜内神经根病变的脊髓造影和CT脊髓造影。每位神经外科医生总共评估了26条颈神经根。与硬膜内检查结果相比,2名研究者分别错误评估了6/26条和2名研究者错误评估了7/26条神经根的腹侧或/和背侧根病变(错误发现率分别为23%和27%)。4位神经外科医生在可评估性和检查结果方面存在相当大的差异。重建手术在创伤后平均6.5个月和硬膜内检查后2周进行。通过前路暴露臂丛神经和相关的颈神经根后,在神经孔附近对13条颈神经根进行电刺激,并从对侧中央后区记录皮质诱发电位(根SEP)。所有5条有SEP的神经根均完整(无神经根病变),所有8条无SEP的神经根在硬膜内检查时显示神经根丝中断(腹侧或/和背侧)。我们的结果表明,关于神经根病变的影像学错误发现是可能的。术中根SEP似乎有助于评估颈神经根病变。然而,需要更多的电生理数据来确定这种方法在未来是否能够在影像学不明确的病例中取代硬膜内检查。