Porjesz B, Begleiter H, Reich T, Van Eerdewegh P, Edenberg H J, Foroud T, Goate A, Litke A, Chorlian D B, Stimus A, Rice J, Blangero J, Almasy L, Sorbell J, Bauer L O, Kuperman S, O'Connor S J, Rohrbaugh J
SUNY Health Science Center at Brooklyn, New York 11203, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998 Sep;22(6):1317-23.
Recent data collected at six identical electrophysiological laboratories from the large national multisite Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism provide evidence for considering the P3 amplitude of the event-related potential as a phenotypic marker for the risk of alcoholism. The distribution of P3 amplitude to target stimuli at the Pz electrode in individuals 16 years of age and over from 163 randomly ascertained control families (n = 687) was compared with those from 219 densely affected alcoholic families (n = 1276) in which three directly interviewed first-degree relatives met both DSM-III-R and Feighner criteria at the definite level for alcohol dependence (stage II). The control sample did not exclude individuals with psychiatric illness or alcoholism to obtain incidence rates of psychiatric disorders similar to those of the general population. P3 amplitude data from control families was converted to Z-scores, and a P3 amplitude beyond 2 SD's below the mean was considered an "abnormal trait." When age- and sex-matched distributions of P3 amplitude were compared, members of densely affected stage II families were more likely to manifest low P3 amplitudes (2 SD below the mean) than members of control families, comparing affected and unaffected offspring, and all individuals; all comparisons of these distributions between groups were significant (p < 0.00001). P3 amplitude means were also significantly lower in stage II family members, compared with control family members for all comparisons, namely probands, affected and unaffected individuals (p < 0.0001), and offspring (p < 0.01). Furthermore, affected individuals from stage II families, but not control families, had significantly lower P3 amplitudes than unaffected individuals (p < 0.001). Affected males from stage II families had significantly lower P3 amplitudes than affected females (p < 0.001). Recent linkage analyses indicate that visual P3 amplitude provides a biological phenotypic marker that has genetic underpinnings.
近期,在大型全国多中心酒精中毒遗传学合作研究中,六个相同的电生理实验室收集的数据为将事件相关电位的P3波幅视为酒精中毒风险的表型标志物提供了证据。将163个随机确定的对照家庭(n = 687)中16岁及以上个体在Pz电极处对目标刺激的P3波幅分布,与219个受酒精中毒影响严重的家庭(n = 1276)进行比较,在这些受影响严重的家庭中,三名接受直接访谈的一级亲属在酒精依赖的明确水平(II期)符合DSM-III-R和费格纳标准。对照样本未排除患有精神疾病或酒精中毒的个体,以获得与一般人群相似的精神疾病发病率。对照家庭的P3波幅数据转换为Z分数,低于平均值2个标准差的P3波幅被视为“异常特征”。当比较年龄和性别匹配的P3波幅分布时,受影响严重的II期家庭的成员比对照家庭的成员更有可能表现出低P3波幅(低于平均值2个标准差),比较了受影响和未受影响的后代以及所有个体;组间这些分布的所有比较均具有显著性(p < 0.00001)。在所有比较中,II期家庭成员的P3波幅平均值也显著低于对照家庭成员,即先证者、受影响和未受影响的个体(p < 0.0001)以及后代(p < 0.01)。此外,II期家庭中受影响的个体,而非对照家庭中的个体,其P3波幅显著低于未受影响的个体(p < 0.001)。II期家庭中受影响的男性的P3波幅显著低于受影响的女性(p < 0.001)。近期的连锁分析表明,视觉P3波幅提供了一个具有遗传基础的生物学表型标志物。