Standardisation for age certainly changes proportions of doctors holding merit awards.
作者信息
Patterson J S
出版信息
BMJ. 1998 Oct 3;317(7163):951. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7163.951c.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Standardisation for age certainly changes proportions of doctors holding merit awards.年龄标准化肯定会改变获得优异奖的医生比例。
BMJ. 1998 Oct 3;317(7163):951. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7163.951c.
2
Consultants' merit award system to be reformed.
BMJ. 1998 Aug 15;317(7156):429. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7156.429.
3
Racial discrimination in distinction awards. Awards system is fair as possible.
BMJ. 1998 Jun 27;316(7149):1977; author reply 1978.
4
Racial discrimination in distinction awards. Analysis should be standardised for age.
BMJ. 1998 Jun 27;316(7149):1978; author reply 1978.
5
Racial discrimination in distinction awards. Discrimination is probably indirect.差别奖励中的种族歧视。这种歧视可能是间接的。
BMJ. 1998 Jun 27;316(7149):1977; author reply 1978.
6
Ethnic and sex bias in discretionary awards.自由裁量奖中的种族和性别偏见。
BMJ. 2003 Mar 29;326(7391):671-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7391.671.
7
Racial discrimination in distinction awards. Money could be better spent on more consultant posts.
BMJ. 1998 Jun 27;316(7149):1979; author reply 1979.
8
Racial discrimination in distinction awards. Vested interest prevents true debate.
BMJ. 1998 Jun 27;316(7149):1978; author reply 1979.
9
Discrimination in discretionary points award scheme: premise is flawed.酌情积分奖励计划中的歧视：前提存在缺陷。
BMJ. 2003 May 31;326(7400):1214-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1214-d.
10
Merit awards.优秀奖
BMJ. 1994 Jun 25;308(6945):1712-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6945.1712a.
本文引用的文献
1
Racial discrimination in distinction awards. Money could be better spent on more consultant posts.
BMJ. 1998 Jun 27;316(7149):1979; author reply 1979.
2
Racial discrimination in distinction awards. Analysis should be standardised for age.
BMJ. 1998 Jun 27;316(7149):1978; author reply 1978.
Zotero 插件