Manfredi R, Chiodo F
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Bologna, Italy.
Pharmacotherapy. 1998 Sep-Oct;18(5):1087-92.
We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of amphotericin B triglyceride emulsion in 16 patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related candidal esophagitis and cryptococcosis, compared with standard amphotericin B in 24 patients. Compared with the conventional formulation, the fat emulsion was administered in a significantly greater daily dose, and required shorter induction period and infusion time (p<0.001-<0.03). Although the two drugs had similar clinical and microbiologic efficacy, the fat emulsion had a better safety profile with respect to frequency of flu-like symptoms, other local and systemic adverse events, and treatment discontinuation (p<0.02-<0.05). Because it is easily available and inexpensive, it may have a number of advantages over the conventional formulation. Further similar comparisons are warranted, in addition to investigations to assess whether reduced toxicity can be obtained with fat emulsion without impairing (or possibly improving) the efficacy of this key antifungal agent.
我们评估了两性霉素B甘油三酯乳剂对16例获得性免疫缺陷综合征相关念珠菌性食管炎和隐球菌病患者的疗效和耐受性,并与24例使用标准两性霉素B的患者进行了比较。与传统制剂相比,脂肪乳剂的每日给药剂量显著更高,诱导期和输注时间更短(p<0.001-<0.03)。虽然两种药物具有相似的临床和微生物学疗效,但脂肪乳剂在流感样症状的发生率、其他局部和全身不良事件以及治疗中断方面具有更好的安全性(p<0.02-<0.05)。由于其易于获得且价格低廉,与传统制剂相比可能具有许多优势。除了进行研究以评估在不损害(或可能提高)这种关键抗真菌药物疗效的情况下,脂肪乳剂是否能降低毒性外,还需要进行进一步的类似比较。