• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

警告对大学样本在韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS-R)上伪装病症的影响。

Effect of warning on feigned malingering on the WAIS-R in college samples.

作者信息

Johnson J L, Bellah C G, Dodge T, Kelley W, Livingston M M

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston 71272, USA.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1998 Aug;87(1):152-4. doi: 10.2466/pms.1998.87.1.152.

DOI:10.2466/pms.1998.87.1.152
PMID:9760640
Abstract

Research indicates claimant malingering of cognitive deficits to be common in personal injury litigation. Efforts have been made to either detect such tendencies or deter efforts at malingering. The present study examined whether warning people that feigned malingering efforts would be detected results in more valid profiles on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. Undergraduates (N = 48) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: feigned malingerers without warning, feigned malingerers with warning, and controls. Analysis indicated both feigned malingerer groups performed significantly worse than the control group; however, feigned malingerers with warning did not perform significantly better than those without warning. Unlike previous research using the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised, results did not support effectiveness of warning in reducing feigned malingering scores.

摘要

研究表明,在人身伤害诉讼中,索赔人伪装认知缺陷的情况很常见。人们已做出努力来检测这种倾向或阻止伪装行为。本研究调查了告知人们伪装行为会被检测到是否会使韦氏成人智力量表修订版的测评结果更有效。本科生(N = 48)被随机分配到三个条件组之一:未被告知的伪装者、被告知的伪装者和对照组。分析表明,两个伪装者组的表现均显著低于对照组;然而,被告知的伪装者的表现并不比未被告知的伪装者显著更好。与之前使用韦氏记忆量表修订版的研究不同,本研究结果不支持告知能有效降低伪装得分。

相似文献

1
Effect of warning on feigned malingering on the WAIS-R in college samples.警告对大学样本在韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS-R)上伪装病症的影响。
Percept Mot Skills. 1998 Aug;87(1):152-4. doi: 10.2466/pms.1998.87.1.152.
2
Detecting feigned impairment with the digit span and vocabulary subtests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-third edition.用韦氏成人智力量表第三版的数字广度和词汇分测验检测伪装障碍
Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Dec;20(4):741-53. doi: 10.1080/13854040590967054.
3
Do warnings deter rather than produce more sophisticated malingering?警示反而会让装病行为更复杂还是更简单?
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010 Aug;32(7):752-62. doi: 10.1080/13803390903512678. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
4
Deterring malingered psychopathology: The effect of warning simulating malingerers.威慑伪装的精神病理学:警告伪装者的效果。
Behav Sci Law. 2009 Jan-Feb;27(1):35-49. doi: 10.1002/bsl.839.
5
The effect of warning on malingering on memory and motor tasks in college samples.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1997;12(3):231-8.
6
Detecting feigned impairment with the word list recognition of the Wechsler Memory Scale-3rd edition.运用韦氏记忆量表第三版的单词列表识别来检测伪装损伤。
Brain Inj. 2009 Mar;23(3):243-9. doi: 10.1080/02699050902748315.
7
Exploration of malingering indices in the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition Digit Span subtest.探讨韦氏成人智力量表第四版数字广度测验中的伪装指数。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012 Mar;27(2):176-81. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acr117. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
8
Identification of feigned mental retardation using the new generation of malingering detection instruments: preliminary findings.使用新一代伪装检测工具识别伪装智力迟钝:初步结果。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Dec;21(6):929-42. doi: 10.1080/13854040600932137.
9
Using intraindividual variability to detect malingering in cognitive performance.利用个体内部变异性检测认知表现中的伪装行为。
Clin Neuropsychol. 1999 Nov;13(4):420-32. doi: 10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT420.
10
Application of clinically-derived malingering cutoffs on the California Verbal Learning Test and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Test-Revised to an analog malingering study.将临床得出的伪装分数界限应用于加州言语学习测验和韦氏成人智力量表修订版,用于一项模拟伪装研究。
Appl Neuropsychol. 2004;11(4):222-8. doi: 10.1207/s15324826an1104_9.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Cognitive Level Explanation Model in Brain Injury : Comparisons between Disability and Non-Disability Evaluation Groups.
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2010 Dec;48(6):506-17. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2010.48.6.506. Epub 2010 Dec 31.