Klockgether T, Skalej M, Wedekind D, Luft A R, Welte D, Schulz J B, Abele M, Bürk K, Laccone F, Brice A, Dichgans J
Department of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Germany.
Brain. 1998 Sep;121 ( Pt 9):1687-93. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.9.1687.
Twenty-six patients suffering from autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia type I were subjected to a genotype-phenotype correlation analysis using molecular genetic assignment to the genetic loci for spinocerebellar ataxia type 1, 2 or 3 (SCA1, SCA2, SCA3) and MRI-based volumetry of posterior fossa structures and basal ganglia nuclei. There was significant atrophy of the cerebellum and brainstem in all three SCA mutations compared with a group of 31 age- and sex-matched controls. Comparison between the SCA groups showed that cerebellar and brainstem atrophy was more severe in SCA2 than in SCA1 and SCA3. Putaminal and caudate volume was reduced only in SCA3, but not in SCA1 and SCA2. A set of three morphological criteria was defined that enabled us to assign all SCA2 and SCA3 patients correctly to the underlying genotype. In contrast, these criteria did not distinguish SCA1 from SCA2 and SCA3. Regression analysis failed to reveal a significant association between CAG repeat length and the volumes of the respective brain structures in any of the SCA mutant types. The present data provide in vivo evidence that SCA2 and SCA3 lead to distinct patterns of brain atrophy, while the atrophy changes in SCA1 overlap with both SCA2 and SCA3.
对26例常染色体显性遗传性小脑共济失调I型患者进行了基因型-表型相关性分析,采用分子遗传学方法将其基因位点定位到脊髓小脑共济失调1型、2型或3型(SCA1、SCA2、SCA3),并对后颅窝结构和基底神经节核进行基于磁共振成像的体积测量。与31名年龄和性别匹配的对照组相比,所有三种SCA突变类型的患者均出现明显的小脑和脑干萎缩。SCA组之间的比较显示,SCA2患者的小脑和脑干萎缩比SCA1和SCA3患者更严重。仅SCA3患者的壳核和尾状核体积减小,而SCA1和SCA2患者未出现这种情况。定义了一组三个形态学标准,使我们能够将所有SCA2和SCA3患者正确地归类到潜在的基因型中。相比之下,这些标准无法区分SCA1与SCA2和SCA3。回归分析未能揭示任何SCA突变类型的CAG重复长度与相应脑结构体积之间存在显著关联。目前的数据提供了体内证据,表明SCA2和SCA3导致不同的脑萎缩模式,而SCA1的萎缩变化与SCA2和SCA3都有重叠。