Eckenhoff R G
Departments of Anesthesia and Physiology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4283, USA.
Mol Pharmacol. 1998 Oct;54(4):610-5.
To determine whether specific or nonspecific interactions between inhaled anesthetics and proteins are more likely to underlie anesthetic actions, analysis of hydrogen/tritium exchange was used to measure effects on the stability of two model proteins that had been previously shown to bind anesthetics specifically (bovine serum albumin) or only nonspecifically (myoglobin). The data indicated that stabilization of albumin correlated with the potencies of a wide range of anesthetic compounds significantly better than did destabilization of myoglobin. In addition, sensitivity to nonanesthetics, isoflurane stereoselectivity, and temperature and pressure effects all influenced the stabilization of bovine serum albumin, but not the destabilization of myoglobin, in a manner strongly supporting the premise that specific binding interactions with protein targets underlie anesthetic action. These observations significantly increase the likelihood that such interactions can be found and optimized.
为了确定吸入麻醉剂与蛋白质之间的特异性或非特异性相互作用是否更有可能是麻醉作用的基础,采用氢/氚交换分析来测量对两种模型蛋白质稳定性的影响,这两种蛋白质先前已被证明分别能特异性结合麻醉剂(牛血清白蛋白)或仅非特异性结合麻醉剂(肌红蛋白)。数据表明,白蛋白的稳定与多种麻醉化合物的效力之间的相关性明显优于肌红蛋白的去稳定。此外,对非麻醉剂的敏感性、异氟烷的立体选择性以及温度和压力效应均以强烈支持与蛋白质靶点的特异性结合相互作用是麻醉作用基础这一前提的方式影响牛血清白蛋白的稳定,但不影响肌红蛋白的去稳定。这些观察结果显著增加了发现并优化此类相互作用的可能性。