Ye W, Sobue T, Lee V S, Tanooka H, Mifune M, Suyama A, Koga T, Morishima H, Kondo S
Cancer Information and Epidemiology Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo.
Jpn J Cancer Res. 1998 Aug;89(8):789-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1998.tb00630.x.
A historical cohort study was conducted in Misasa town, Tottori prefecture, Japan, where radon spas have been operating for a long time. Misasa town was divided into an elevated radon level area and a control area, with mean indoor radon levels of about 60 and 20 Bq/m3, respectively. In total, 3,083 subjects in the elevated radon level area and 1,248 in the control area, all aged 40 or older on January 1, 1976, were followed up until December 31, 1993, for a mean period of 14 years. The mortality rates from all causes exhibited no difference between the elevated radon level area and the control area for both sexes. No difference was observed in the incidence of all-site cancers (age, period-adjusted rate ratios by Poisson regression, RR = 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-1.42 for males, RR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.65-1.24 for females), while stomach cancer incidence seemed to decrease for both sexes (RR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.44-1.11 for male, RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.34-1.00 for female) and lung cancer incidence for males only seemed to increase (RR = 1.65, 95% CI 0.83-3.30 for male, RR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.28-4.14 for female) in the elevated radon level area. Caution is needed in the interpretation of these findings, however, since the individual exposure level was not measured and major confounding factors, such as smoking and diet, could not be controlled in this study.
在日本鸟取县的美作町开展了一项历史性队列研究,当地的氡温泉已运营很长时间。美作町被划分为高氡水平区域和对照区域,室内平均氡水平分别约为60和20 Bq/m³。共有3083名高氡水平区域的受试者和1248名对照区域的受试者,所有受试者在1976年1月1日时均年满40岁,随访至1993年12月31日,平均随访期为14年。两性的全因死亡率在高氡水平区域和对照区域之间均无差异。所有部位癌症的发病率也无差异(通过泊松回归调整年龄和时期后的发病率比,男性RR = 1.06,95%置信区间(CI)0.79 - 1.42;女性RR = 0.90,95% CI 0.65 - 1.24),而两性的胃癌发病率似乎均有所下降(男性RR = 0.70,95% CI 0.44 - 1.11;女性RR = 0.58,95% CI 0.34 - 1.00),且仅男性的肺癌发病率似乎有所上升(男性RR = 1.65,95% CI 0.83 - 3.30;女性RR = 1.07,95% CI 0.28 - 4.14)。然而,在解释这些结果时需要谨慎,因为本研究未测量个体暴露水平,且无法控制吸烟和饮食等主要混杂因素。