• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有症状的创伤性颈内动脉夹层血管重建术后的长期移植血管通畅率及临床结局

Long-term graft patency rates and clinical outcomes after revascularization for symptomatic traumatic internal carotid artery dissection.

作者信息

Vishteh A G, Marciano F F, David C A, Schievink W I, Zabramski J M, Spetzler R F

机构信息

Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Mercy Healthcare Arizona, Phoenix, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 1998 Oct;43(4):761-7; discussion 767-8. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199810000-00016.

DOI:10.1097/00006123-199810000-00016
PMID:9766301
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Surgical management of traumatic internal carotid artery (ICA) dissection remains controversial. Therefore, the delayed outcomes and graft patency rates of patients who underwent bypass procedures for symptomatic traumatic ICA dissection were studied.

METHODS

Between September 1989 and August 1996, 13 patients (9 male and 4 female patients; mean age, 30.6 yr) underwent 16 revascularization procedures for symptomatic traumatic ICA dissection. The duration of clinical follow-up averaged 47.3 months (range, 12-94 mo) from the date of diagnosis. The duration of radiographic follow-up (catheter or magnetic resonance angiography, duplex Doppler ultrasonography) averaged 24 months (range, 12-60 mo).

RESULTS

ICA dissection was caused by blunt (n = 11) or penetrating trauma (n = 2). Associated angiographic abnormalities included seven ipsilateral ICA occlusions, six dissecting aneurysms, two carotid-cavernous fistulae, and six contralateral traumatic ICA dissections. Patients requiring early revascularization (n = 6) underwent bypass procedures an average of 19.2 days after their injuries. Medically managed patients who developed ischemia later were revascularized a mean of 7.8 months after injury. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale score at the time of presentation was 10 (range, scores of 6-15), and the mean Glasgow Coma Scale score before revascularization was 14 (range, scores of 9-15). There were 14 saphenous vein ICA bypasses (8 cervical-to-petrous, 3 cervical-to-middle cerebral artery, 3 petrous-to-supraclinoid) and 2 superficial temporal artery-to-middle cerebral artery bypasses. There was one early postoperative graft occlusion, which responded to surgical thrombectomy. One patient with multiple other traumatic injuries died as a result of a pulmonary embolus 12 months after revascularization. All remaining patients had Glasgow Outcome Scale scores of 5, with patent bypass grafts confirmed during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Revascularization for persistently symptomatic traumatic ICA dissection eliminated ischemia and was associated with excellent long-term outcomes and graft patency rates.

摘要

引言

创伤性颈内动脉(ICA)夹层的外科治疗仍存在争议。因此,我们对因症状性创伤性ICA夹层而接受搭桥手术患者的延迟结局和移植物通畅率进行了研究。

方法

1989年9月至1996年8月期间,13例患者(9例男性和4例女性;平均年龄30.6岁)因症状性创伤性ICA夹层接受了16次血运重建手术。从诊断之日起,临床随访时间平均为47.3个月(范围12 - 94个月)。影像学随访(导管或磁共振血管造影、双功多普勒超声检查)时间平均为24个月(范围12 - 60个月)。

结果

ICA夹层由钝性创伤(n = 11)或穿透性创伤(n = 2)引起。相关的血管造影异常包括7例同侧ICA闭塞、6例夹层动脉瘤、2例颈动脉海绵窦瘘和6例对侧创伤性ICA夹层。需要早期血运重建的患者(n = 6)在受伤后平均19.2天接受搭桥手术。后期出现缺血的保守治疗患者在受伤后平均7.8个月进行血运重建。就诊时格拉斯哥昏迷量表平均评分为10分(范围6 - 15分),血运重建前格拉斯哥昏迷量表平均评分为14分(范围9 - 15分)。有14例大隐静脉ICA搭桥(8例颈 - 岩骨段、3例颈 - 大脑中动脉段、3例岩骨 - 床突上段)和2例颞浅动脉 - 大脑中动脉搭桥。术后早期有1例移植物闭塞,经手术取栓后恢复通畅。1例伴有多处其他创伤的患者在血运重建12个月后因肺栓塞死亡。其余所有患者格拉斯哥预后量表评分为5分,随访期间证实搭桥移植物通畅。

结论

对持续有症状的创伤性ICA夹层进行血运重建可消除缺血,且与良好的长期结局和移植物通畅率相关。

相似文献

1
Long-term graft patency rates and clinical outcomes after revascularization for symptomatic traumatic internal carotid artery dissection.有症状的创伤性颈内动脉夹层血管重建术后的长期移植血管通畅率及临床结局
Neurosurgery. 1998 Oct;43(4):761-7; discussion 767-8. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199810000-00016.
2
Cervical-to-petrous internal carotid artery saphenous vein in situ bypass for the treatment of a high cervical dissecting aneurysm: technical case report.颈内动脉至岩骨段原位大隐静脉搭桥术治疗高位颈段夹层动脉瘤:技术病例报告
Neurosurgery. 1996 Oct;39(4):863-6. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199610000-00047.
3
Graft Occlusion and Graft Size Changes in Complex Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm Treated by Extracranial to Intracranial Bypass Using High-Flow Grafts with Therapeutic Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion.使用高流量移植物行颅外至颅内搭桥术并治疗性闭塞颈内动脉治疗复杂颈内动脉动脉瘤时的移植物闭塞和移植物大小变化
Neurosurgery. 2017 Oct 1;81(4):672-679. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx075.
4
Revascularization and aneurysm surgery: current techniques, indications, and outcome.血运重建与动脉瘤手术:当前技术、适应症及结果
Neurosurgery. 1996 Jan;38(1):83-92; discussion 92-4. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199601000-00020.
5
Long-Term Outcomes of Cerebral Blood Flow and Neurotransmitter Receptor Function on Iodine-123-Iomazenil Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography and Cognitive Assessments After Parent Artery Occlusion Combined with Cerebral Revascularization for Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms.载瘤动脉闭塞联合颅内外动脉搭桥术治疗颈内动脉动脉瘤后碘-123-依马唑仑单光子发射计算机断层扫描脑血流和神经递质受体功能与认知评估的长期结果。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Nov;143:e199-e205. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.07.119. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
6
Rationale for graft selection in patients with complex internal carotid artery aneurysms treated with extracranial to intracranial high-flow bypass and therapeutic internal carotid artery occlusion.对于接受颅外-颅内高流量搭桥术和治疗性颈内动脉闭塞术治疗的复杂颈内动脉动脉瘤患者,选择移植物的理由。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;128(6):1753-1761. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS161986. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
7
Skull base resection with cervical-to-petrous carotid artery bypass to facilitate repair of distal internal carotid artery lesions.采用颈段至岩骨段颈动脉搭桥术进行颅底切除术,以利于修复颈内动脉远端病变。
Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Feb;10(1):31-7. doi: 10.1016/s0967-2109(01)00109-0.
8
Saphenous vein graft bypass of the cavernous internal carotid artery.
J Neurosurg. 1990 Jan;72(1):35-41. doi: 10.3171/jns.1990.72.1.0035.
9
Open surgical reconstruction of the internal carotid artery aneurysm at the base of the skull.颅底颈内动脉动脉瘤的开放式外科重建。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Feb;51(2):323-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.084.
10
Revascularization and pediatric aneurysm surgery.血管重建与小儿动脉瘤手术。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014 Jun;13(6):641-6. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.PEDS13444. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical and radiological interventions for treating symptomatic extracranial cervical artery dissection.手术和放射介入治疗症状性颅外颈内动脉夹层。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 1;2(2):CD013118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013118.pub2.
2
Systematic review of the effectiveness of carotid surgery and endovascular carotid stenting versus best medical treatment in managing symptomatic acute carotid artery dissection.颈动脉手术和血管内颈动脉支架置入术与最佳药物治疗对有症状急性颈动脉夹层治疗效果的系统评价
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jul;9(14):1212. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7279.
3
Traumatic Internal Carotid Artery Injuries: Do We Need a Screening Strategy? Literature Review, Case Report, and Forensic Evaluation.
创伤性颈内动脉损伤:我们是否需要一种筛查策略?文献回顾、案例报告和法医学评估。
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2022 Aug 3;20(9):1752-1773. doi: 10.2174/1570159X19666210712125929.
4
Antithrombotic drugs for carotid artery dissection.用于颈动脉夹层的抗血栓药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6(10):CD000255. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000255.pub2.
5
Indications and problems of intracranial stenting. Report of two cases.颅内支架置入的适应症及问题。两例报告。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2000 Nov 30;6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):149-54. doi: 10.1177/15910199000060S122. Epub 2001 May 15.
6
State of the art: noninvasive imaging and management of neurovascular trauma.最新技术:神经血管创伤的无创成像与管理
World J Emerg Surg. 2007 Jan 9;2:1. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-2-1.
7
Blunt carotid injury.
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2006 Apr;8(2):167-73. doi: 10.1007/s11936-006-0009-7.
8
Proximal superficial temporal artery to proximal middle cerebral artery bypass using a radial artery graft: an anatomic approach.采用桡动脉移植物行颞浅动脉近端至大脑中动脉近端搭桥术:解剖学入路
Neurosurg Rev. 2004 Jul;27(3):185-8. doi: 10.1007/s10143-003-0317-2. Epub 2003 Nov 22.