Folliguet T, Le Bret E, Moneta A, Dibie A, Temkine J, Philippe F, Dib J C, Laborde F
Département médico-chirurgical cardiovasculaire, L'Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris.
Presse Med. 1998 Jun 6;27(20):954-7.
Saphenous grafts used for coronary artery bypass are classically dissected via a continuous incision of the leg, the thigh or both. Recently, a new video-surgery technique has been introduced in an attempt to reduce the trauma of saphenous vein dissection. The aim of this work was to evaluate the possible benefits of this new technique compared with classical dissection.
Sixty patients requiring coronary artery bypass grafts were included in this study and randomly divided into two groups. In group I (30 patients) the saphenous vein was dissected according to the classical technique. The video-surgery technique was used for the other 30 patients in group II. The two groups were not significantly different for mean age, sex ratio, or history of diabetes or lower limb arteriopathy. The same number of bypasses was performed in both groups (2.6 +/- 0.7). Outcome was compared for: dissection related complications (hematomas, infections), length of the skin incision over the length of the dissected vein, duration of the dissection procedure, and post-operative pain.
A leg incision was used in 28 cases out of 30 cases in both groups. The length of the saphenous vein dissected was 27.6 cm in group I and 21.8 cm in group II. The length of the skin incision was 27 cm in group I and only 4.7 cm in the video-surgery group II, giving an incision/vein ratio of 97% and 21% respectively. Operative time was however 37.9 min for group I and 48.5 min for group II. There was no significant difference between the groups for hematoma formation or infection but the patients in the video-surgery group experienced less post-operative pain.
Besides an improvement in the esthetic result, video-surgery dissection of the saphenous vein reduces post-operative pain at the cost of a slightly longer operative procedure.
用于冠状动脉搭桥的大隐静脉传统上是通过腿部、大腿或两者的连续切口进行解剖。最近,一种新的视频手术技术被引入,试图减少大隐静脉解剖的创伤。这项研究的目的是评估这种新技术与传统解剖相比可能带来的益处。
本研究纳入了60例需要冠状动脉搭桥的患者,并随机分为两组。第一组(30例患者)按照传统技术解剖大隐静脉。第二组的30例患者采用视频手术技术。两组在平均年龄、性别比例、糖尿病史或下肢动脉病变方面无显著差异。两组进行的搭桥数量相同(2.6±0.7)。比较两组的以下结果:解剖相关并发症(血肿、感染)、解剖静脉长度上的皮肤切口长度、解剖过程持续时间以及术后疼痛情况。
两组30例患者中各有28例采用腿部切口。第一组解剖的大隐静脉长度为27.6厘米,第二组为21.8厘米。第一组皮肤切口长度为27厘米,而视频手术组第二组仅为4.7厘米,切口与静脉长度的比例分别为97%和21%。然而,第一组手术时间为37.9分钟,第二组为48.5分钟。两组在血肿形成或感染方面无显著差异,但视频手术组患者术后疼痛较轻。
除了改善美观效果外,大隐静脉的视频手术解剖以手术过程稍长为代价减轻了术后疼痛。