Cunningham M D, Reidy T J
Behav Sci Law. 1998 Summer;16(3):333-51. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0798(199822)16:3<333::aid-bsl314>3.0.co;2-n.
Antisocial Personality Disorder (APD) and PCL-R psychopathy are critically examined regarding their application to sentencing determinations. PCL-R psychopathy is emerging in the literature as a more useful forensic diagnostic construct than APD, which appears flawed by multiple weaknesses. These include shifting diagnostic criteria, innumeracy problems, absence of symptom weighting, temporal instability, and the equivalence of some symptoms with substance abuse disorders. Additionally, APD overdiagnosis may result from inattention to issues of social context, trauma history, and symptom pervasiveness. Neither objective nor projective personality testing reliably differentiates APD. Finally, an APD diagnosis does not always indicate criminal, much less incorrigible criminal behavior. By contrast, PCL-R psychopathy results are strongly predictive of criminal behavior and violent recidivism for Caucasian males through mid-life residing in the community. Emerging research with the PCL-R regarding other important populations and contexts is promising but generalization is currently limited.
就反社会人格障碍(APD)和PCL-R精神病态在量刑裁决中的应用进行了批判性审视。在文献中,PCL-R精神病态正逐渐成为一种比APD更有用的法医诊断结构,而APD似乎存在多个缺陷。这些缺陷包括诊断标准的变化、数字理解问题、症状权重缺失、时间稳定性不足以及某些症状与物质滥用障碍的等同性。此外,对社会背景、创伤史和症状普遍性问题的忽视可能导致APD的过度诊断。无论是客观的还是投射性的人格测试都不能可靠地区分APD。最后,APD诊断并不总是意味着犯罪,更不用说不可救药的犯罪行为了。相比之下,对于居住在社区中的中年白人男性,PCL-R精神病态的结果强烈预测犯罪行为和暴力再犯。关于PCL-R在其他重要人群和背景下的新兴研究很有前景,但目前推广有限。