Bloche M G
Georgetown University Law Center, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1998 Sep-Oct;17(5):7-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.17.5.7.
The emergence of investor-owned firms as major actors in U.S. health care financing and delivery has led to calls for federal and state intervention to protect nonprofits and to stem the for-profit sector's growth. High-profile scandals involving some of these firms have lent urgency to such proposals. This paper considers the case for government intervention to protect the nonprofit health sector. The controversy over the comparative merits of nonprofits and for-profits is reformed as a debate over the potential and limits of government action, and the case for a general presumption favoring protection for nonprofits is found to be unpersuasive.
投资者所有的公司在美国医疗保健融资和服务中成为主要参与者,这引发了要求联邦和州进行干预以保护非营利组织并遏制营利性部门增长的呼声。涉及其中一些公司的备受瞩目的丑闻使这些提议变得紧迫。本文探讨政府干预以保护非营利性医疗部门的理由。关于非营利组织和营利组织相对优点的争议被重新表述为一场关于政府行动的潜力和局限性的辩论,结果发现支持普遍推定保护非营利组织的理由缺乏说服力。