Thomas E J, Orav E J, Brennan T A
Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Apr;15(4):211-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2000.07003.x.
To determine if type of hospital ownership is associated with preventable adverse events.
Medical record review of a random sample of 15,000 nonpsychiatric, non-Veterans Administration hospital discharges in Utah and Colorado in 1992.
A two-stage record review process using nurse and physician reviewers was used to detect adverse events. Preventability was then judged by 2 study investigators who were blinded to hospital characteristics. The association among preventable adverse events and hospital ownership was evaluated using logistic regression with nonprofit hospitals as the reference group while controlling for other patient and hospital characteristics. We analyzed 4 hospital ownership categories: nonprofit, for-profit, major teaching government (e.g., county or state ownership), and minor or nonteaching government.
When compared with patients in nonprofit hospitals, multivariate analyses adjusting for other patient and hospital characteristics found that patients in minor or nonteaching government hospitals were more likely to suffer a preventable adverse event of any type (odds ratio [OR] 2.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45 to 4.20); preventable operative adverse events (OR, 4.85; 95% CI, 2.44 to 9.62); and preventable adverse events due to delayed diagnoses and therapies (OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 1.48 to 12.31). Patients in for-profit hospitals were also more likely to suffer preventable adverse events of any type (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.38); preventable operative adverse events (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.42 to 4.87); and preventable adverse events due to delayed diagnoses and therapies (OR, 4.15; 95% CI, 1. 84 to 9.34). Patients in major teaching government hospitals were less likely to suffer preventable adverse drug events (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.89).
Patients in for-profit and minor teaching or nonteaching government-owned hospitals were more likely to suffer several types of preventable adverse events. Further research is needed to determine how these events could be prevented.
确定医院所有权类型是否与可预防的不良事件相关。
1992年对犹他州和科罗拉多州15000例非精神科、非退伍军人管理局医院出院病例的随机样本进行病历审查。
采用护士和医生审查员进行两阶段病历审查过程以检测不良事件。然后由2名对医院特征不知情的研究调查员判断可预防性。在控制其他患者和医院特征的同时,以非营利性医院作为参照组,采用逻辑回归评估可预防不良事件与医院所有权之间的关联。我们分析了4种医院所有权类别:非营利性、营利性、大型教学型政府医院(如县或州属医院)以及小型或非教学型政府医院。
在对其他患者和医院特征进行多变量分析调整后发现,与非营利性医院的患者相比,小型或非教学型政府医院的患者更有可能发生任何类型的可预防不良事件(比值比[OR]为2.46;95%置信区间[CI]为1.45至4.20);可预防的手术不良事件(OR为4.85;95%CI为2.44至9.62);以及因诊断和治疗延迟导致的可预防不良事件(OR为4.27;95%CI为1.48至12.31)。营利性医院的患者也更有可能发生任何类型的可预防不良事件(OR为1.57;95%CI为1.03至2.38);可预防的手术不良事件(OR为2.63;95%CI为1.42至4.87);以及因诊断和治疗延迟导致的可预防不良事件(OR为4.15;95%CI为1.84至9.34)。大型教学型政府医院的患者发生可预防的药物不良事件的可能性较小(OR为0.38;95%CI为0.16至0.89)。
营利性医院以及小型教学型或非教学型政府所属医院的患者更有可能发生几种类型的可预防不良事件。需要进一步研究以确定如何预防这些事件。