• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用“得普利麻靶控输注系统”进行丙泊酚“靶控输注”(TCI)的可预测性与精确性

[Predictability and precision of "target-controlled infusion" (TCI) of propofol with the "Disoprifusor TCI" system].

作者信息

Fechner J, Albrecht S, Ihmsen H, Knoll R, Schwilden H, Schüttler J

机构信息

Klinik für Anästhesiologie der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 1998 Aug;47(8):663-8. doi: 10.1007/s001010050611.

DOI:10.1007/s001010050611
PMID:9770089
Abstract

UNLABELLED

In Germany a TCI-system for propofol (Disoprifusor-TCI) has been commercially available since spring 1997. We investigated the prediction error and precision of this TCI system as part of a multicentre study. Bias, precision, blood concentrations and dosage of propofol were compared with patients receiving propofol via a manually controlled infusion device.

METHODS

After approval by the local Ethics Committee and written informed consent, 21 patients of ASA-classification I to III scheduled for major abdominal surgery received either a target controlled infusion (group T, Disoprifusor-TCI) or a manually controlled infusion (group M) of propofol. The propofol plasma concentrations were measured by HPLC. The prediction error for each measurement, the median prediction error (MDPE) or bias, the median absolute prediction error (MDAPE) or precision and the divergence (change of the prediction error over infusion time) were calculated for both groups.

RESULTS

For all patients in group T (n = 12) the bias of the TCI system was 6.7% and the precision 27.5%. For 70% of all measured plasma concentrations the absolute prediction error was < or = 37%. The divergence was -5.4% per hour. For all patients in group M (n = 9) the bias was 44.2% and the precision 50%. The mean amount of propofol infused per kilogram body weight and hour was significant higher in T (9.0 +/- 1.2 mg/kg/h) than in M (6.6 +/- 1.2 mg/kg/h, p < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

With a precision of 27.5% the investigated TCI system (Diprifusor-TCI) showed an acceptable inaccuracy, as for TCI-systems a median prediction error of +/- 30% has to be expected due to the inherent variability of pharmacokinetic parameters. Further studies will be necessary to find out whether the investigated TCI system for propofol may offer substantial advantages.

摘要

未标注

在德国,自1997年春季起丙泊酚靶控输注系统(Disoprifusor-TCI)已投入商业使用。作为一项多中心研究的一部分,我们对该靶控输注系统的预测误差和精确度进行了调查。将丙泊酚的偏差、精确度、血药浓度和剂量与通过手动控制输注装置接受丙泊酚治疗的患者进行了比较。

方法

经当地伦理委员会批准并获得书面知情同意后,21例计划接受腹部大手术的ASA分级为I至III级的患者,分别接受丙泊酚靶控输注(T组,Disoprifusor-TCI)或手动控制输注(M组)。采用高效液相色谱法测定丙泊酚血浆浓度。计算两组每次测量的预测误差、中位预测误差(MDPE)或偏差、中位绝对预测误差(MDAPE)或精确度以及离散度(预测误差随输注时间的变化)。

结果

T组所有患者(n = 12)中,靶控输注系统的偏差为6.7%,精确度为27.5%。在所有测量的血浆浓度中,70%的绝对预测误差≤37%。离散度为每小时-5.4%。M组所有患者(n = 9)中,偏差为44.2%,精确度为50%。T组每千克体重每小时输注的丙泊酚平均量(9.0±1.2 mg/kg/h)显著高于M组(6.6±1.2 mg/kg/h,p < 0.005)。

结论

所研究的靶控输注系统(Diprifusor-TCI)精确度为27.5%,显示出可接受的不准确性,因为对于靶控输注系统,由于药代动力学参数的固有变异性,预期中位预测误差为±30%。有必要进行进一步研究以确定所研究的丙泊酚靶控输注系统是否可能具有显著优势。

相似文献

1
[Predictability and precision of "target-controlled infusion" (TCI) of propofol with the "Disoprifusor TCI" system].使用“得普利麻靶控输注系统”进行丙泊酚“靶控输注”(TCI)的可预测性与精确性
Anaesthesist. 1998 Aug;47(8):663-8. doi: 10.1007/s001010050611.
2
Predictive performance of 'Diprifusor' TCI system in patients during upper abdominal surgery under propofol/fentanyl anesthesia.“得普利麻”靶控输注系统在丙泊酚/芬太尼麻醉下上腹部手术患者中的预测性能
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2005 Jan;6(1):43-8. doi: 10.1631/jzus.2005.B0043.
3
Predictive performance of computer-controlled infusion of remifentanil during propofol/remifentanil anaesthesia.丙泊酚/瑞芬太尼麻醉期间瑞芬太尼计算机控制输注的预测性能
Br J Anaesth. 2003 Feb;90(2):132-41. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg046.
4
The performance of compartmental and physiologically based recirculatory pharmacokinetic models for propofol: a comparison using bolus, continuous, and target-controlled infusion data.隔室和基于生理的丙泊酚再循环药代动力学模型的性能:使用推注、连续和靶控输注数据的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2010 Aug;111(2):368-79. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181bdcf5b. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
5
Assessment of the performance of the Marsh model in effect site mode for target controlled infusion of propofol during the maintenance phase of general anaesthesia in an unselected population of neurosurgical patients.在未选择的神经外科手术患者群体中,评估Marsh模型在效应室模式下用于全身麻醉维持期丙泊酚靶控输注的性能。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Oct;30(10):627-32. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328363157a.
6
Simulation analysis of the performance of target-controlled infusion of propofol in Chinese patients.丙泊酚靶控输注在中国患者中的性能模拟分析。
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2007 Sep;45(3):141-7.
7
Evaluation of SLOG/TCI-III pediatric system on target control infusion of propofol.评价 SLOG/TCI-III 儿科靶控输注系统在丙泊酚靶控输注中的应用。
J Transl Med. 2011 Nov 1;9:187. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-187.
8
Individual titration of propofol plasma target improves anaesthetic stability in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a comparison with manually controlled infusion.丙泊酚血浆靶控个体化滴定可提高腹部大手术患者的麻醉稳定性:与手动控制输注的比较
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Sep;25(9):741-7. doi: 10.1017/S0265021508004328. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
9
Precision and Bias of Target-Controlled Prolonged Propofol Infusion for General Anesthesia and Sedation in Neurosurgical Patients.神经外科患者全身麻醉和镇静中靶控丙泊酚持续输注的精度和偏差
J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 May;58(5):606-612. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1060. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
10
Propofol anaesthesia via target controlled infusion or manually controlled infusion: effects on the bispectral index as a measure of anaesthetic depth.通过靶控输注或手动控制输注进行丙泊酚麻醉:对作为麻醉深度指标的脑电双频指数的影响。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2001 Dec;29(6):579-84. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0102900602.

引用本文的文献

1
The predictive performance of infusion strategy nomogram based on a fluid kinetic model.基于流体动力学模型的输液策略列线图的预测性能。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015 Apr;68(2):128-35. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.2.128. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
2
Individualizing propofol dosage: a multivariate linear model approach.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2014 Dec;28(6):525-36. doi: 10.1007/s10877-013-9510-1. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
3
[EEG-adjusted target-controlled infusion : Propofol target concentration with different doses of remifentanil].[脑电图调整的靶控输注:不同剂量瑞芬太尼下的丙泊酚靶浓度]
Anaesthesist. 2010 Feb;59(2):126-34. doi: 10.1007/s00101-009-1666-1.
4
[Target-controlled infusion (TCI) - a concept with a future?: state-of-the-art, treatment recommendations and a look into the future].[靶控输注(TCI)——一个具有未来前景的概念?:最新技术水平、治疗建议及未来展望]
Anaesthesist. 2008 Mar;57(3):223-30. doi: 10.1007/s00101-008-1329-7.
5
[Target-controlled infusion (TCI): clinical tool or scientific toy?].[靶控输注(TCI):临床工具还是科学玩具?]
Anaesthesist. 2008 Mar;57(3):221-2. doi: 10.1007/s00101-008-1332-z.
6
[Pharmacodynamics of two different propofol formulations].[两种不同丙泊酚制剂的药效学]
Anaesthesist. 2006 Jun;55(6):635-42. doi: 10.1007/s00101-006-0987-6.
7
[Effect compartment equilibration and time-to-peak effect. Importance of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic principle for the daily clinical practice].[效应室平衡与达峰时间。药代动力学-药效学原理在日常临床实践中的重要性]
Anaesthesist. 2005 Oct;54(10):1021-31. doi: 10.1007/s00101-005-0864-8.
8
[Accuracy of target-controlled infusion (TCI) with 2 different propofol formulations].[两种不同丙泊酚制剂靶控输注(TCI)的准确性]
Anaesthesist. 2004 Oct;53(10):937-43. doi: 10.1007/s00101-004-0753-6.