Suppr超能文献

[普罗司匹定与甲氨蝶呤脉冲疗法:类风湿关节炎的疗效比较(12个月对照研究)]

[Pulse therapy with prospidin and methotrexate: comparative efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis (12-month controlled study)].

作者信息

Nemtsov B F, Benenson E V, Timina O V

出版信息

Klin Med (Mosk). 1998;76(8):24-8.

PMID:9770962
Abstract

Efficiency of pulse-therapy with prospidin (500 mg for 5 days in hospital, 500-1000 mg for a month as maintenance) and methotrexate (30 mg a week i.v. in hospital, 7-10 mg a week as maintenance) was investigated in 93 patients with severe RA. The response to prospidin and methotrexate arose quickly (within 10-14 and 4-5 weeks, respectively) and occurred in 73 and 70% of patients, respectively. Withdrawal of the drug was caused by side effects of methotrexate (19.3%) and resistance to prospidin (23.2%).

摘要

对93例重症类风湿关节炎(RA)患者研究了丙磺吡定脉冲疗法(住院期间5天内每日500毫克,维持期每月500 - 1000毫克)和甲氨蝶呤(住院期间每周静脉注射30毫克,维持期每周7 - 10毫克)的疗效。对丙磺吡定和甲氨蝶呤的反应出现迅速(分别在10 - 14周和4 - 5周内),分别有73%和70%的患者出现反应。停药原因是甲氨蝶呤的副作用(19.3%)和对丙磺吡定耐药(23.2%)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验