• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于流产的研究:围产期悲伤强度量表的编制与验证

A study of miscarriage: development and validation of the Perinatal Grief Intensity Scale.

作者信息

Hutti M H, dePacheco M, Smith M

机构信息

Women's Health Nurse Practitioner Program, University of Louisville School of Nursing, KY 40292, USA.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1998 Sep-Oct;27(5):547-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1998.tb02621.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1552-6909.1998.tb02621.x
PMID:9773366
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This article outlines the development of the Perinatal Grief Intensity Scale (PGIS). It is based on a theoretical model developed to predict intensity of grief response to early pregnancy loss.

DESIGN

Participants completed the PGIS by mail and made an overall assessment of their grief intensity by completing a single Likert-type item.

PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample of 186 women who had experienced a miscarriage before 16 weeks gestation in the previous 12-18 months.

RESULTS

Fourteen items were retained after factor analyses, loading at .4 or greater. The 14 items loaded on a three-factor solution as predicted and accounted for 65% of the variance. Three factors were found to influence intensity of grieving: Reality of the pregnancy and baby within (Reality), congruence between the actual miscarriage experience and the woman's standard of the desirable (Congruence), and the ability of parents to make decisions or act in ways to increase this congruence (Confront Others). Chronbach's alpha for the entire instrument was .82, with subscale reliability scores of .89 (Reality), .84 (Confront Others), and .71 (Congruence).

CONCLUSION

The PGIS demonstrates acceptable beginning reliability and validity in predicting grief intensity. Further testing of the instrument is needed with all types of pregnancy losses. The level of score needed to predict intense responses also needs to be determined.

摘要

目的

本文概述了围产期悲伤强度量表(PGIS)的开发情况。它基于一个理论模型,该模型旨在预测对早期妊娠丢失的悲伤反应强度。

设计

参与者通过邮件完成PGIS,并通过完成一个单一的李克特式项目对其悲伤强度进行总体评估。

参与者

选取了186名在过去12至18个月内经历过妊娠16周前流产的女性作为便利样本。

结果

经过因子分析后保留了14个项目,载荷量为0.4或更高。这14个项目如预期那样加载到一个三因子解决方案中,解释了65%的方差。发现有三个因素影响悲伤强度:子宫内妊娠和胎儿的真实性(现实性)、实际流产经历与女性期望标准的一致性(一致性)以及父母做出决策或以增加这种一致性的方式行动的能力(面对他人)。整个量表的克朗巴赫α系数为0.82,各子量表的信度得分分别为:现实性0.89、面对他人0.84、一致性0.71。

结论

PGIS在预测悲伤强度方面显示出可接受的初步信度和效度。需要对该量表进行针对所有类型妊娠丢失的进一步测试。还需要确定预测强烈反应所需的分数水平。

相似文献

1
A study of miscarriage: development and validation of the Perinatal Grief Intensity Scale.一项关于流产的研究:围产期悲伤强度量表的编制与验证
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1998 Sep-Oct;27(5):547-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1998.tb02621.x.
2
Evaluation of the perinatal grief intensity scale in the subsequent pregnancy after perinatal loss.围产期丧亲后再次妊娠时围产期悲伤强度量表的评估
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2013 Nov-Dec;42(6):697-706. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12249. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
3
Predicting grief intensity after recent perinatal loss.预测近期围产期丧亲后的悲伤强度。
J Psychosom Res. 2017 Oct;101:128-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
4
Predicting Need for Follow-Up Due to Severe Anxiety and Depression Symptoms After Perinatal Loss.预测围产期丧亲后因严重焦虑和抑郁症状而进行随访的必要性。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2018 Mar;47(2):125-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2018.01.003.
5
Grief intensity, psychological well-being, and the intimate partner relationship in the subsequent pregnancy after a perinatal loss.围产期损失后后续妊娠中的悲伤强度、心理健康及亲密伴侣关系。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2015 Jan-Feb;44(1):42-50. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12539.
6
Spanish adaptation of the perinatal grief intensity scale.围产期悲伤强度量表的西班牙语改编版。
J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2025 Sep;43(5):1276-1287. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2024.2328049. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
7
Grieving after early pregnancy loss--a common reality.早期妊娠丢失后的悲伤——一个常见的现实。
Ir Med J. 2012 Nov-Dec;105(10):326-8.
8
Miscarriage and stillbirth: time since the loss, grief intensity and satisfaction with care.流产与死产:自失去后的时间、悲伤强度及对护理的满意度。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993 Dec 30;52(3):163-8. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(93)90066-l.
9
Parameters of grieving in spontaneous abortion.自然流产中的悲伤参数。
Int J Psychiatry Med. 1999;29(2):235-49. doi: 10.2190/UDW4-2EAG-1RTY-D1Y4.
10
Factors contributing to men's grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal death: further development of an emerging model in an Australian sample.导致男性在妊娠丢失和新生儿死亡后悲痛的因素:在澳大利亚样本中对一个新兴模型的进一步发展。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03514-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated with Perinatal Bereavement Among Mothers in Bolivia: A Qualitative Study.玻利维亚母亲围产期丧亲之痛的相关因素:一项定性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 12;13(6):615. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13060615.
2
A meta-core outcome set for stillbirth prevention and bereavement care following stillbirth in LMIC.低收入和中等收入国家死胎预防及死胎后哀伤护理的元核心结局集。
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Jan 28;10(1):e017688. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017688.
3
Grief intensity following adolescent miscarriage or abortion: A descriptive study of recollections of adult women.
青少年流产或堕胎后的悲伤强度:成年女性回忆的描述性研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 2;10(13):e33634. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33634. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
4
"Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of perinatal grief scale in Urdu: Addressing a gap in the research of perinatal loss in Pakistan-Cross-sectional validation study".《乌尔都语围产期悲伤量表的翻译、文化调适及验证:填补巴基斯坦围产期丧亲研究的空白——横断面验证研究》
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 11;7(4):e1999. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1999. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Validation of a Brief Measure for Complicated Grief Specific to Reproductive Loss.针对生殖损失所致复杂性悲伤的简短测量工具的验证
Cureus. 2023 Apr 20;15(4):e37884. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37884. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
Measuring Grief in the Context of Traumatic Loss: A Systematic Review of Assessment Instruments.创伤性丧失背景下悲伤的评估:评估工具的系统评价。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Oct;24(4):2346-2362. doi: 10.1177/15248380221093694. Epub 2022 May 26.
7
Incorporating patient perspectives in the development of a core outcome set for reproductive genetic carrier screening: a sequential systematic review.将患者观点纳入生殖遗传携带者筛查的核心结局集制定中:一项序贯系统评价。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Jul;30(7):756-765. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01090-1. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
8
Miscarriage, Perceived Ostracism, and Trauma: A Preliminary Investigation.流产、感知到的排斥与创伤:一项初步调查。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 27;12:747860. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.747860. eCollection 2021.
9
Creation of interdisciplinary guidelines for care of women presenting to the emergency department with pregnancy loss.为前往急诊科就诊的流产女性制定跨学科护理指南。
J Perinatol. 2017 Jul;37(7):757-761. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.61. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
10
Infertility and Perinatal Loss: When the Bough Breaks.不孕与围产期损失:当树枝折断时。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2016 Mar;18(3):31. doi: 10.1007/s11920-016-0663-8.