Prince H E, Hogrefe W R
MRL Reference Laboratory, Cypress, California 90630, USA.
J Clin Lab Anal. 1998;12(5):320-4. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2825(1998)12:5<320::aid-jcla13>3.0.co;2-x.
Sera (n = 90) giving positive results in a screening test for antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens (ENAs) were tested in a line immunoblot assay that measures antibody reactivity with individual ENAs in a single test field. Results were then compared to those obtained in monospecific ENA antibody enzyme immunoassays (EIAs). Discordant results were resolved by immunodiffusion. Of 540 result pairs (90 sera tested for 6 ENAs [Sm/RNP, Sm, SSA, SSB, Scl-70, Jo-1]), 509 (94%) showed concordance. Immunodiffusion resolved 28 of 31 discordant result pairs in favor of the immunoblot result. After resolution of discordant data, the immunoblot assay exhibited 100% sensitivity for all ENA antibodies except those recognizing Scl-70, for which the sensitivity was 89%; specificity was over 96% for all 6 ENA antibodies. These findings show that a line immunoblot assay for the characterization of ENA antibodies yields results comparable to those obtained using monospecific ENA antibody EIAs. The immunoblot assay is easier and less expensive to perform due to its utilization of a single test field.
对可提取核抗原(ENA)抗体筛查试验呈阳性的90份血清,采用线性免疫印迹法进行检测,该方法可在单个检测区域内测定抗体与单个ENA的反应性。然后将结果与单特异性ENA抗体酶免疫测定(EIA)的结果进行比较。不一致的结果通过免疫扩散法解决。在540对结果(90份血清检测6种ENA [Sm/RNP、Sm、SSA、SSB、Scl-70、Jo-1])中,509对(94%)结果一致。免疫扩散法解决了31对不一致结果中的28对,支持免疫印迹法的结果。在解决不一致数据后,免疫印迹法对除识别Scl-70的抗体外的所有ENA抗体显示出100%的敏感性,识别Scl-70的抗体敏感性为89%;所有6种ENA抗体的特异性均超过96%。这些结果表明,用于ENA抗体鉴定的线性免疫印迹法所产生的结果与使用单特异性ENA抗体EIA获得的结果相当。由于免疫印迹法使用单个检测区域,因此操作更简便且成本更低。