Polley J W, Figueroa A A
Craniofacial Center at the University of Illinois at Chicago, Cleft Palate Clinic at Cook County Hospital, 60612, USA.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Oct;102(5):1360-72; discussion 1373-4.
Patients with severe maxillary hypoplasia secondary to congenital facial clefting present numerous challenging problems for the reconstructive surgeon. Traditional surgical/orthodontic approaches for these patients often fall short of expectations, especially for achieving normal facial aesthetics and proportions. The purpose of this paper is to present our clinical experience and cephalometric results with the use of rigid external distraction for the treatment of patients with severe maxillary deficiency. Eighteen consecutive orofacial cleft patients with severe maxillary hypoplasia were treated with maxillary distraction osteogenesis. Criteria for patient selection included severe maxillary hypoplasia with negative overjet of 8 mm or greater, patients with normal mandibular morphology, and patients with full primary dentition or older. There were 10 unilateral cleft lip and palate patients, 6 bilateral cleft lip and palate patients, and 2 patients with severe congenital facial clefting. A maxillary splint was prepared for each patient, and all patients underwent a high Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy. All surgery was performed on either an outpatient or a 23-hour admission basis. No patient required blood transfusions or intermaxillary fixation. Two types of mechanical distraction were utilized in this series. In group 1 (n = 14), the patients underwent rigid external distraction with an external distraction device. In group 2 (n = 4), patients underwent face mask distraction with elastics. There was no surgical morbidity in any of the patients. For the patients in the rigid external distraction group, the mean effective horizontal advancement of the maxilla was 11.7 mm. All of these patients had correction of their negative overjet. For patients in the face mask distraction group, the results were disappointing. The mean effective advancement of the maxilla in this group was only 5.2 mm. In all face mask distraction patients, the initial maxillary hypoplasia was undercorrected. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis with rigid external distraction permits full correction of the midfacial deficiency, including both the skeletal and soft-tissue deficiencies. Rigid external distraction in patients with severe maxillary hypoplasia allows full correction of the deformity through treatment of the affected region only. It offers the distinct advantage of correcting these severe deformities through a minimal procedure. Rigid external distraction has dramatically improved our treatment results for patients with severe cleft maxillary hypoplasia.
继发于先天性面部裂隙的严重上颌骨发育不全患者给重建外科医生带来了诸多具有挑战性的问题。针对这些患者的传统外科/正畸方法往往达不到预期效果,尤其是在实现正常面部美学和比例方面。本文的目的是介绍我们使用坚固外牵张治疗严重上颌骨发育不全患者的临床经验和头影测量结果。连续18例严重上颌骨发育不全的口面部裂隙患者接受了上颌骨牵张成骨治疗。患者选择标准包括严重上颌骨发育不全、覆盖超过8毫米或更大的负覆盖、下颌形态正常的患者以及乳牙列完整或年龄较大的患者。其中单侧唇腭裂患者10例,双侧唇腭裂患者6例,严重先天性面部裂隙患者2例。为每位患者制作了上颌夹板,所有患者均接受了高位Le Fort I型上颌骨截骨术。所有手术均在门诊或23小时住院的基础上进行。没有患者需要输血或颌间固定。本系列采用了两种机械牵张方式。在第1组(n = 14)中,患者使用外牵张装置进行坚固外牵张。在第2组(n = 4)中,患者使用弹性带进行面罩牵张。所有患者均无手术并发症。在坚固外牵张组的患者中,上颌骨的平均有效水平前移为11.7毫米。所有这些患者的负覆盖均得到了矫正。对于面罩牵张组的患者,结果令人失望。该组上颌骨的平均有效前移仅为5.2毫米。在所有面罩牵张患者中,最初的上颌骨发育不全矫正不足。采用坚固外牵张的上颌骨牵张成骨术可以完全矫正面中部缺损,包括骨骼和软组织缺损。对于严重上颌骨发育不全的患者,坚固外牵张仅通过治疗受影响区域就能完全矫正畸形。它具有通过最小的手术程序矫正这些严重畸形的明显优势。坚固外牵张显著改善了我们对严重腭裂上颌骨发育不全患者的治疗效果。