• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

化学风险评估:高级管理人员、毒理学家与公众之间的比较

Judgments of chemical risks: comparisons among senior managers, toxicologists, and the public.

作者信息

Mertz C K, Slovic P, Purchase I F

机构信息

Central Toxicology Laboratory, Maccelesfield, Cheshire, U.K.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 1998 Aug;18(4):391-404. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb00353.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb00353.x
PMID:9775449
Abstract

Nineteen Senior Managers of a major chemical company in the United Kingdom participated in a survey to determine their attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions regarding risks from chemicals. Similar surveys had previously been conducted with toxicologists and members of the general public in the United States and Canada. In general, the Senior Managers tended to judge risks to be quite small for most chemicals. Moreover, they had lower risk perceptions than did members of the British Toxicological Society and even far lower perceptions of risk than a comparison group of members of the Canadian public. The managers held views that were similar to British toxicologists working in industry and government and dissimilar to the views of toxicologists working in academia. The observed differences between views of managers, toxicologists, and the public must be recognized and understood in order to facilitate communication and constructive efforts to manage chemical risks.

摘要

英国一家大型化工公司的19名高级经理参与了一项调查,以确定他们对化学品风险的态度、信念和认知。此前在美国和加拿大对毒理学家和普通公众进行过类似的调查。总体而言,高级经理们倾向于认为大多数化学品的风险相当小。此外,他们的风险认知低于英国毒理学会的成员,甚至比加拿大公众的一个对照组的风险认知低得多。这些经理们的观点与在工业界和政府工作的英国毒理学家相似,与在学术界工作的毒理学家的观点不同。为了促进化学品风险管理方面的沟通和建设性努力,必须认识和理解经理、毒理学家和公众观点之间观察到的差异。

相似文献

1
Judgments of chemical risks: comparisons among senior managers, toxicologists, and the public.化学风险评估:高级管理人员、毒理学家与公众之间的比较
Risk Anal. 1998 Aug;18(4):391-404. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb00353.x.
2
Evaluating chemical risks: results of a survey of the British Toxicology Society.评估化学风险:英国毒理学会调查结果
Hum Exp Toxicol. 1997 Jun;16(6):289-304. doi: 10.1177/096032719701600601.
3
Intuitive toxicology: expert and lay judgments of chemical risks.直观毒理学:专家和外行对化学风险的判断
Toxicol Pathol. 1994 Mar-Apr;22(2):198-201. doi: 10.1177/019262339402200214.
4
Managerialism and public attitudes towards UK NHS managers.
J Manag Med. 1997;11(4):214-21. doi: 10.1108/02689239710177314.
5
Careers in toxicology in Europe--options and requirements. Report of a workshop organized on behalf of the Individual Members of EUROTOX during the EUROTOX Congress 2000 in London (September 17-20, 2000).
Arch Toxicol. 2001 Jul;75(5):251-61. doi: 10.1007/s002040100232.
6
Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, government and business attitudes.对纳米技术风险的认知与对利益相关者的信任:一项关于公众、学术、政府和企业态度的横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 26;15:424. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1795-1.
7
[Attitudes toward the environment: a North / South analysis].[对环境的态度:南北分析]
Tiers Monde. 1992 Apr-Jun;33(130):355-72.
8
History of the American College of Toxicology (ACT).美国毒理学会(ACT)的历史。
Int J Toxicol. 2004;23(5):285-99. doi: 10.1080/10915810490517054.
9
Fairness and nanotechnology concern.公平与纳米技术关切。
Risk Anal. 2011 Nov;31(11):1749-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01676.x. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
10
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.

引用本文的文献

1
Chemical Prioritisation for Human Biomonitoring in Ireland: A Synergy of Global Frameworks and Local Perspectives.爱尔兰人体生物监测的化学物质优先排序:全球框架与地方视角的协同作用
Toxics. 2025 Apr 7;13(4):281. doi: 10.3390/toxics13040281.
2
A Study on the Strategy of Sustainable Governance of NIMBY Movements: Focusing on Civil Environmental Rights.邻避运动的可持续治理策略研究:以公民环境权为重点。
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Aug 25;2022:2514373. doi: 10.1155/2022/2514373. eCollection 2022.
3
Perception of Environmental Risks and Health Promotion Attitudes of French Perinatal Health Professionals.
法国围产期健康专业人员对环境风险的认知及健康促进态度
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Dec 18;13(12):1255. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13121255.
4
Scientists versus regulators: precaution, novelty & regulatory oversight as predictors of perceived risks of engineered nanomaterials.科学家与监管者:作为工程纳米材料感知风险预测因素的预防措施、新颖性与监管监督
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 15;9(9):e106365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106365. eCollection 2014.
5
Expert views on regulatory preparedness for managing the risks of nanotechnologies.专家对管理纳米技术风险的监管准备工作的看法。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 11;8(11):e80250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080250. eCollection 2013.
6
Heterogeneous risk perceptions: the case of poultry meat purchase intentions in Finland.异质风险感知:以芬兰鸡肉购买意愿为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Oct 11;10(10):4925-43. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10104925.
7
Factors influencing acquisition of ecological and exposure information about hazards and risks from contaminated sites.影响获取有关受污染场地危害和风险的生态及暴露信息的因素。
Environ Monit Assess. 2008 Feb;137(1-3):413-25. doi: 10.1007/s10661-007-9777-0. Epub 2007 Jul 11.
8
Avian influenza risk perception, Hong Kong.香港的禽流感风险认知
Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 May;11(5):677-82. doi: 10.3201/eid1105.041225.