• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚对避蚊胺、CIC - 4和AI3 - 37220驱避剂针对费氏按蚊(双翅目:蚊科)的实验室及现场评估。

Laboratory and field evaluation of the repellents deet, CIC-4, and AI3-37220 against Anopheles farauti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Australia.

作者信息

Frances S P, Cooper R D, Sweeney A W

机构信息

Australian Army Malaria Institute, Enoggera, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Entomol. 1998 Sep;35(5):690-3. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/35.5.690.

DOI:10.1093/jmedent/35.5.690
PMID:9775594
Abstract

Laboratory and field tests of the repellents diethyl methylbenzamide (deet), 1-(3-cyclohexen-1-yl-carbonyl)-2-methylpiperidine (AI3-37220), and (2-hydroxymethylcyclohexyl) acetic acid lactone (CIC-4) were conducted against Anopheles farauti s.s. Laveran, an important malaria vector in the southwest Pacific region. In the laboratory, An. farauti was tolerant of all 3 repellents, but deet and CIC-4 provided significantly better protection than AI3-37220. The field study was conducted in rain forest located near Innisfail, northern Queensland, and tested 25% (vol:vol) ethanol solutions of each repellent against An. farauti. All 3 repellents provided > 95% protection against An. farauti for 5 h after application. In contrast to the laboratory tests, protection provided by AI3-37220 was significantly better than that by either deet or CIC-4, and there was no difference between protection by deet and CIC-4. The protection by deet and CIC-4 declined 8 h after application and provided < or = 50% protection at 9 h. In contrast, AI3-37220 provided > or = 94% protection for 9 h.

摘要

针对太平洋西南部地区重要的疟疾传播媒介——法氏按蚊指名亚种(Anopheles farauti s.s. Laveran),开展了驱蚊剂二乙甲苯酰胺(避蚊胺)、1-(3-环己烯-1-基羰基)-2-甲基哌啶(AI3-37220)和(2-羟甲基环己基)乙酸内酯(CIC-4)的实验室和现场测试。在实验室中,法氏按蚊对所有这三种驱蚊剂都有耐受性,但避蚊胺和CIC-4提供的防护明显优于AI3-37220。现场研究在昆士兰州北部因尼斯费尔附近的雨林中进行,测试了每种驱蚊剂的25%(体积比)乙醇溶液对法氏按蚊的效果。所有这三种驱蚊剂在施用后5小时内对法氏按蚊的防护率均超过95%。与实验室测试不同的是,AI3-37220提供的防护明显优于避蚊胺或CIC-4,避蚊胺和CIC-4提供的防护之间没有差异。避蚊胺和CIC-4在施用8小时后防护效果下降,在9小时时防护率≤50%。相比之下,AI3-37220在9小时内提供的防护率≥94%。

相似文献

1
Laboratory and field evaluation of the repellents deet, CIC-4, and AI3-37220 against Anopheles farauti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Australia.澳大利亚对避蚊胺、CIC - 4和AI3 - 37220驱避剂针对费氏按蚊(双翅目:蚊科)的实验室及现场评估。
J Med Entomol. 1998 Sep;35(5):690-3. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/35.5.690.
2
Laboratory and field evaluation of deet, CIC-4, and AI3-37220 against Anopheles dirus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand.
J Med Entomol. 1996 Jul;33(4):511-5. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/33.4.511.
3
Field evaluation of the repellents deet, CIC-4, and AI3-37220 against Anopheles in Lae, Papua New Guinea.驱蚊剂避蚊胺、CIC - 4和AI3 - 37220在巴布亚新几内亚莱城针对按蚊的现场评估。
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1999 Sep;15(3):339-41.
4
Laboratory evaluation of AI3-37220, AI3-35765, CIC-4, and deet repellents against three species of mosquitoes.对AI3-37220、AI3-35765、CIC-4和避蚊胺对三种蚊子的驱避效果进行实验室评估。
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1999 Sep;15(3):342-7.
5
Laboratory and field evaluation of SS220 and deet against mosquitoes in Queensland, Australia.澳大利亚昆士兰州针对SS220和避蚊胺对蚊子的实验室及实地评估。
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2009 Jun;25(2):174-8. doi: 10.2987/08-5823.1.
6
Field evaluation of arthropod repellents, deet and a piperidine compound, AI3-37220, against Anopheles funestus and Anopheles arabiensis in western Kenya.节肢动物驱避剂、避蚊胺和一种哌啶化合物AI3-37220在肯尼亚西部针对斯氏按蚊和阿拉伯按蚊的现场评估。
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1996 Jun;12(2 Pt 1):172-6.
7
Field evaluation of repellent formulations against daytime and nighttime biting mosquitoes in a tropical rainforest in northern Australia.在澳大利亚北部热带雨林中对驱蚊配方针对白天和夜间叮咬蚊子的实地评估。
J Med Entomol. 2002 May;39(3):541-4. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585-39.3.541.
8
Laboratory and field evaluation of five repellents against the black flies Prosimulium mixtum and P. fuscum (Diptera: Simuliidae).
J Med Entomol. 1992 Mar;29(2):267-72. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/29.2.267.
9
Field evaluation of deet against Anopheles farauti at Ndendo (Santa Cruz) Island, Solomon Islands.在索罗门群岛圣克鲁斯省恩顿岛(Ndendo)实地评估避蚊胺驱防按蚊法。
J Med Entomol. 2010 Sep;47(5):851-4. doi: 10.1603/me10044.
10
Laboratory evaluation of repellents against four anopheline mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) and two phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae).针对四种按蚊(双翅目:蚊科)和两种白蛉(双翅目:蛾蠓科)的驱避剂的实验室评估。
J Med Entomol. 1993 May;30(3):499-502. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/30.3.499.

引用本文的文献

1
Remarkable repellency of Ligusticum sinense (Umbelliferae), a herbal alternative against laboratory populations of Anopheles minimus and Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae).中药川芎(伞形科)对微小按蚊和埃及伊蚊实验室种群具有显著驱避作用(双翅目:蚊科)。
Malar J. 2015 Aug 7;14:307. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0816-y.
2
Efficacy of Advanced Odomos repellent cream (N, N-diethyl-benzamide) against mosquito vectors.高级奥道姆驱蚊霜(N,N-二乙基间苯甲酰胺)对病媒蚊的功效。
Indian J Med Res. 2011 Apr;133(4):426-30.
3
Repellence of essential oils of aromatic plants growing in Argentina against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae).
阿根廷芳香植物精油对埃及伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)的驱避作用。
Parasitol Res. 2011 Jan;108(1):69-78. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-2042-4. Epub 2010 Sep 14.
4
Evaluation of Hexane Extract of Tuber of Root of Cyperus rotundus Linn (Cyperaceae) for Repellency against Mosquito Vectors.香附子(莎草科)块茎正己烷提取物对蚊媒驱避作用的评估
J Parasitol Res. 2009;2009. doi: 10.1155/2009/908085. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
5
Field evaluation of G10, a celery (Apium graveolens)-based topical repellent, against mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Chiang Mai province, northern Thailand.在泰国北部清迈府,对基于芹菜(旱芹)的外用驱避剂G10针对蚊子(双翅目:蚊科)进行现场评估。
Parasitol Res. 2009 Feb;104(3):515-21. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-1224-9. Epub 2008 Oct 14.