• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与传统阑尾切除术——随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

作者信息

Sauerland S, Lefering R, Holthausen U, Neugebauer E A

机构信息

2nd Department of Surgery, University of Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998 Aug;383(3-4):289-95. doi: 10.1007/s004230050135.

DOI:10.1007/s004230050135
PMID:9776459
Abstract

AIM

To compare the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic and conventional "open" appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis.

METHODS

Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials available by May 1998 that compared both techniques. Within each trial and for each outcome an effect size was calculated; the effect sizes were then pooled by a random-effects model.

RESULTS

We summarised outcome data of 2877 patients included in 28 trials. Operating time was +16 min (95% confidence interval +12-20 min) longer for laparoscopic appendectomy. Overall complication rates were comparable, but wound infections were definitely reduced after laparoscopy [rate difference -4.2%, (-2.3% to -6.1%)]. Intra-abdominal abscesses, however, occurred slightly more frequently [+0.9%, (-0.4% to +2.3%)]. Hospital stay after laparoscopic appendectomy was 15 h (8-23 h) shorter, and patients returned to full fitness or work 7 days (5-9 days) earlier. Pain intensity on day 1 was slightly less. Heterogeneity was present for some outcome measures due to methodological differences among the primary studies.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic appendectomy reduces wound infections and eases postoperative recovery. Nevertheless, the various differences among the primary studies and their partly flawed methodology make it difficult to generalise from these findings.

摘要

目的

比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统“开放”阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的有效性和安全性。

方法

对1998年5月前可得的比较这两种技术的随机对照试验进行荟萃分析。在每个试验中,针对每个结果计算效应量;然后通过随机效应模型汇总效应量。

结果

我们总结了28项试验中纳入的2877例患者的结果数据。腹腔镜阑尾切除术的手术时间长16分钟(95%置信区间为长12 - 20分钟)。总体并发症发生率相当,但腹腔镜检查后伤口感染明显减少[率差 - 4.2%,(- 2.3%至 - 6.1%)]。然而,腹腔内脓肿的发生频率略高[+ 0.9%,(- 0.4%至 + 2.3%)]。腹腔镜阑尾切除术后的住院时间短15小时(8 - 23小时),患者恢复完全健康或恢复工作的时间提前7天(5 - 9天)。术后第1天的疼痛强度略低。由于主要研究之间的方法学差异,一些结果测量存在异质性。

结论

腹腔镜阑尾切除术可减少伤口感染并促进术后恢复。然而,主要研究之间的各种差异及其部分存在缺陷的方法学使得难以从这些发现中进行推广。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.腹腔镜与传统阑尾切除术——随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998 Aug;383(3-4):289-95. doi: 10.1007/s004230050135.
2
Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与传统阑尾切除术的比较——随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov 3;10:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-129.
3
Evidence of surgical outcomes fluctuates over time: results from a cumulative meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis.手术结果的证据随时间波动:急性阑尾炎腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术累积荟萃分析的结果
BMC Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar 15;16:37. doi: 10.1186/s12876-016-0453-0.
4
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.疑似阑尾炎患者的腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:随机对照试验的Meta分析的系统评价
BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr 15;15:48. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0277-3.
5
A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis.对疑似患有急性阑尾炎患者进行腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的荟萃分析。
Can J Surg. 1999 Oct;42(5):377-83.
6
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy.比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术和开腹阑尾切除术的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1999 Jan;9(1):17-26.
7
Outcome after introduction of laparoscopic appendectomy in children: A cohort study.儿童腹腔镜阑尾切除术后的结局:一项队列研究。
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Mar;51(3):449-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
8
Meta-analysis of randomized trials on single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.单切口腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术随机试验的荟萃分析。
Am J Surg. 2014 Apr;207(4):613-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.07.045. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
9
Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗阑尾炎:随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析
Surg Today. 2015 Sep;45(9):1179-86. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-1094-y. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
10
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a meta-analysis.儿童腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:一项荟萃分析
Ann Surg. 2006 Jan;243(1):17-27. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000193602.74417.14.

引用本文的文献

1
Therapeutic strategy for acute appendicitis based on laparoscopic surgery.基于腹腔镜手术的急性阑尾炎治疗策略。
BMC Surg. 2023 Jun 13;23(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02070-y.
2
Surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery in children: an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study.儿童胃肠手术后手术部位感染:一项国际性、多中心、前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Dec;5(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003429.
3
Laparoscopic appendicectomy is superior to open surgery for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术优于开腹手术治疗复杂阑尾炎。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2072-2082. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06746-6. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
4
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗疑似阑尾炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4.
5
Mini-Incision Open Appendectomy with Incision Skin Tissue Retractor vs. Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Retrospective Study of the Management of Child Acute Appendicitis.小切口开腹阑尾切除术联合切口皮肤组织牵开器与腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗小儿急性阑尾炎的回顾性研究。
Adv Ther. 2018 Dec;35(12):2176-2185. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0829-3. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
6
Hybrid appendectomy with classic trocar on McBurney's point.采用位于麦氏点的传统套管针进行混合式阑尾切除术。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018 Mar;13(1):57-61. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.70323. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
7
Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: How to discourage surgeons using inadequate therapy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎:如何阻止外科医生采用不充分的治疗方法。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug 28;23(32):5849-5859. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i32.5849.
8
Methodological overview of systematic reviews to establish the evidence base for emergency general surgery.建立急诊普通外科循证基础的系统评价方法概述
Br J Surg. 2017 Apr;104(5):513-524. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10476.
9
Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy: early results after 115 consecutive patients.腹腔镜下左半胰切除术:115例连续患者的早期结果
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4480-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4780-6. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
10
Comparison of clinical outcomes of open, laparoscopic and single port appendicectomies.开放式、腹腔镜式及单孔式阑尾切除术的临床结果比较
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013 Oct;95(7):468-72. doi: 10.1308/003588413X13629960049397.