• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of clinical outcomes of open, laparoscopic and single port appendicectomies.开放式、腹腔镜式及单孔式阑尾切除术的临床结果比较
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013 Oct;95(7):468-72. doi: 10.1308/003588413X13629960049397.
2
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的前瞻性随机比较。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Feb;24(2):266-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0563-7. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
3
Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎的疗效比较。
Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):927-32. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822aa8ea.
4
Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术的临床疗效
JSLS. 2009 Oct-Dec;13(4):574-80. doi: 10.4293/108680809X1258998404524.
5
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术。结局的前瞻性随机研究。
Arch Surg. 1997 Jul;132(7):708-11; discussion 712. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430310022003.
6
Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis is more favorable for patients with comorbidities, the elderly, and those with complicated appendicitis: a nationwide population-based study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗阑尾炎对合并症患者、老年患者和复杂性阑尾炎患者更为有利:一项全国范围内基于人群的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Sep;25(9):2932-42. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1645-x. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
7
Single-port laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port approach for acute appendicitis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统三孔法治疗儿童急性阑尾炎的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2021 Jan;37(1):119-127. doi: 10.1007/s00383-020-04776-z. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
8
Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in Greek reality.希腊实际情况下腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术的比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Oct;22(5):471-6. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31825806b2.
9
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
10
Clinical outcome and cost comparison between laparoscopic and open appendicectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术的临床结果及成本比较
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2014 Sep;43(9):464-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Urinary Tract Injuries in Abdominal, Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery: a Comprehensive Review.腹部、腹腔镜及机器人手术中的泌尿系统损伤:综述
Maedica (Bucur). 2025 Jun;20(2):358-365. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.358.
2
Laparoscopic appendectomy with single port vs conventional access: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统方法的比较:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):1667-1684. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10659-w. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
3
Bayesian network meta-analysis of the effects of single-incision laparoscopic surgery, conventional laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy for the treatment of acute appendicitis.单孔腹腔镜手术、传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术及开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎效果的贝叶斯网络Meta分析
Exp Ther Med. 2017 Dec;14(6):5908-5916. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.5343. Epub 2017 Oct 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎的腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术对比
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2012 Sep;10(22):239-42.
2
Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Ann Surg. 2013 Feb;257(2):214-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318273bde4.
3
Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy: a preliminary multicentric comparative study in 87 patients with acute appendicitis.单孔经脐腹腔镜阑尾切除术:87例急性阑尾炎患者的初步多中心比较研究
Minim Invasive Surg. 2012;2012:492409. doi: 10.1155/2012/492409. Epub 2012 May 13.
4
Pain after laparoscopic appendectomy: a comparison of transumbilical single-port and conventional laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜阑尾切除术后疼痛:经脐单孔手术与传统腹腔镜手术的比较
J Korean Surg Soc. 2012 Mar;82(3):172-8. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2012.82.3.172. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
5
Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006-2008.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗儿童阑尾炎的疗效比较:来自全国住院患者样本(NIS)的数据,2006-2008 年。
World J Surg. 2012 Mar;36(3):573-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1417-8.
6
Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy: comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Mar;22(2):142-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0253. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
7
Technical approaches to single port/incision laparoscopic appendicectomy: a literature review.单孔/单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术的技术方法:文献综述
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011 Oct;93(7):508-13. doi: 10.1308/147870811X13137608455091.
8
Laparoscopic appendectomy conversion rates two decades later: an analysis of surgeon and patient-specific factors resulting in open conversion.腹腔镜阑尾切除术 20 年后的中转率:分析导致中转开腹的术者和患者相关因素。
J Surg Res. 2012 Jul;176(1):42-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.07.019. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
9
Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial.单切口与标准 3 孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Ann Surg. 2011 Oct;254(4):586-90. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823003b5.
10
Transumbilical laparoscopically assisted appendectomy in children: the results of a single-port, single-channel procedure.经脐单孔腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术治疗儿童阑尾炎:单通道单端口手术的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb;26(2):523-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1912-x. Epub 2011 Sep 23.

开放式、腹腔镜式及单孔式阑尾切除术的临床结果比较

Comparison of clinical outcomes of open, laparoscopic and single port appendicectomies.

作者信息

Jiang X, Meng H B, Zhou D L, Ding W X, Lu L S

机构信息

Shanghai 10th People's Hospital, China.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013 Oct;95(7):468-72. doi: 10.1308/003588413X13629960049397.

DOI:10.1308/003588413X13629960049397
PMID:24112490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5827292/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Appendicectomy is the most common surgical procedure performed in general surgery. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of open appendicectomy (OA), laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) and single port laparoscopic appendicectomy (SPLA).

METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients with suspected acute appendicitis were studied (OA: n=20, LA: n=20, SPLA: n=10). Clinical outcomes were compared between the three groups in terms of operative time, blood loss, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and cost.

RESULTS

Patient demographics were similar among groups (p>0.05). SPLA was characterised by longer operative time (88.1 minutes vs 35.6 minutes in OA and 33.4 minutes in LA) and higher costs (12.84 thousand Chinese yuan [RMB] vs 8.41 thousand RMB in LA and 4.99 thousand RMB in OA). OA was characterised by more blood loss (9.8ml vs 7.5ml in SPLA and 6.8ml in LA), longer hospital stay (7.5 days vs 3.5 days in LA and 3.4 days in SPLA) and lower costs. The total number of complications was higher for OA (n=2) than for LA and SPLA (n=0) although this was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Where feasible, LA should be undertaken as the initial treatment of choice for most cases of suspected appendicitis.

摘要

引言

阑尾切除术是普通外科最常见的手术。本研究旨在比较开腹阑尾切除术(OA)、腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)和单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(SPLA)的疗效。

方法

对连续50例疑似急性阑尾炎患者进行研究(OA组:n = 20,LA组:n = 20,SPLA组:n = 10)。比较三组患者的手术时间、失血量、术后并发症、住院时间和费用等临床结局。

结果

各组患者的人口统计学特征相似(p>0.05)。SPLA的特点是手术时间较长(88.1分钟,而OA为35.6分钟,LA为33.4分钟)且费用较高(1.284万元人民币,而LA为0.841万元人民币,OA为0.499万元人民币)。OA的特点是失血量较多(9.8ml,而SPLA为7.5ml,LA为6.8ml)、住院时间较长(7.5天,而LA为3.5天,SPLA为3.4天)且费用较低。OA的并发症总数(n = 2)高于LA和SPLA(n = 0),尽管差异无统计学意义。

结论

在可行的情况下,LA应作为大多数疑似阑尾炎病例的首选初始治疗方法。