• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为青少年演绎推理中介的表象

Representations as mediators of adolescent deductive reasoning.

作者信息

Klaczynski P A, Narasimham G

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, North Carolina 28723, USA.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 1998 Sep;34(5):865-81. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.34.5.865.

DOI:10.1037//0012-1649.34.5.865
PMID:9779734
Abstract

In Experiment 1, preadolescents, middle adolescents, and late adolescents were presented 3 deductive reasoning tasks. With some important exceptions, conditional reasoning improved with age on problems containing permission conditional relations, and reasoning fallacies increased with age on problems containing causal conditional relations. The results of Experiments 2a and 2b indicated that problem type (i.e., permission or causal) does not mediate the activation of conditional reasoning skills. Rather, valid conditional inferences are more common on problems for which plausible alternative antecedents can be generated than on problems for which alternative antecedent generation is difficult. Conditional rules for which alternative antecedent generation is difficult may be misrepresented as biconditionals, resulting in biconditional rather than conditional reasoning.

摘要

在实验1中,向青春期前儿童、青少年中期和青少年晚期呈现了3项演绎推理任务。除了一些重要的例外情况,在包含许可条件关系的问题上,条件推理能力随年龄增长而提高,而在包含因果条件关系的问题上,推理谬误随年龄增长而增加。实验2a和2b的结果表明,问题类型(即许可或因果)并不会调节条件推理技能的激活。相反,与难以生成替代前件的问题相比,可以生成合理替代前件的问题上有效条件推理更为常见。难以生成替代前件的条件规则可能会被错误地表示为双条件,从而导致双条件推理而非条件推理。

相似文献

1
Representations as mediators of adolescent deductive reasoning.作为青少年演绎推理中介的表象
Dev Psychol. 1998 Sep;34(5):865-81. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.34.5.865.
2
Is inferential reasoning just probabilistic reasoning in disguise?推理仅仅是伪装下的概率推理吗?
Mem Cognit. 2005 Oct;33(7):1315-23. doi: 10.3758/bf03193231.
3
Efficiency of retrieval correlates with "logical" reasoning from causal conditional premises.检索效率与基于因果条件前提的“逻辑”推理相关。
Mem Cognit. 2002 Jul;30(5):696-706. doi: 10.3758/bf03196426.
4
Developmental and individual differences in conditional reasoning: effects of logic instructions and alternative antecedents.条件推理中的发展性与个体差异:逻辑指令与替代前因的影响
Child Dev. 2006 Mar-Apr;77(2):339-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00874.x.
5
Pragmatic schemas and the selection task: to reason or not to reason.实用图式与选择任务:推理与否
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1992 Jul;45(1):133-48. doi: 10.1080/14640749208401319.
6
Reasoning strategies for suppositional deductions.假设性演绎的推理策略。
Cognition. 1997 Jan;62(1):1-49. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00720-2.
7
Conditional reasoning with false premises facilitates the transition between familiar and abstract reasoning.有错误前提的条件推理促进了熟悉推理和抽象推理之间的转换。
Child Dev. 2011 Mar-Apr;82(2):646-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01526.x. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
8
Evaluation of conditional and biconditional hypotheses in information-use tasks during adolescence.青少年信息使用任务中条件和双条件假设的评估。
J Genet Psychol. 1993 Mar;154(1):111-26. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1993.9914726.
9
Conditional reasoning and causation.条件推理与因果关系。
Mem Cognit. 1991 May;19(3):274-82. doi: 10.3758/bf03211151.
10
Understanding of logical necessity: developmental antecedents and cognitive consequences.对逻辑必然性的理解:发展的前因与认知结果。
Child Dev. 1998 Jun;69(3):721-41.

引用本文的文献

1
Reasoning With Conditionals About Everyday and Mathematical Concepts in Primary School.小学阶段关于日常和数学概念的条件推理
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 29;11:531640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.531640. eCollection 2020.
2
The influence of cognitive development and perceived racial discrimination on the psychological well-being of African American youth.认知发展和感知到的种族歧视对非裔美国青年心理健康的影响。
J Youth Adolesc. 2010 Jun;39(6):694-703. doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9438-4. Epub 2009 Jul 19.
3
The effect of emotion on interpretation and logic in a conditional reasoning task.
情绪对条件推理任务中解释与逻辑的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jul;34(5):1112-25. doi: 10.3758/bf03193257.