Adachi E, Yoshino K, Kimura T, Matsumoto Y, Takeda T
Department of Infectious Diseases Research, National Children's Medical Research Center.
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1998 Aug;72(8):808-12. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.72.808.
Intravenously administered immune globulin therapy has been reported to be an effective treatment for serious patients with verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli infections while an efficacy for VT2 are under discussion. We therefore examined in vitro commercially available immune globulin preparations for the presence of anti-VT neutralizing antibodies in expectation of protecting a patient from serious complications as HUS. We examined 47 lots of gamma-globulin prepared by 5 pharmaceutical companies in Japan. Of them 29 lots were prepared from imported blood and 18 lots were from Japanese donors' blood. They were prepared in each company following their own manufactures' process. Neutralizing activity for VT1 and VT2 were determined by means of cytotoxicity using ACHN (renal adenocarcinoma, human) cells. All lots of gamma-globulin preparations from imported blood completely neutralized 125 pg/ml VT1 at the concentration of 12.5 mg/ml, and no significant difference was found in the manufactures' process. On the other hand gamma-globulin preparations from Japanese donors' blood neutralized VT1 five times less than the former. None of all preparations neutralized VT2. Gammaglobulin preparations were produced from pooled human plasma. To know the difference of neutralizing activities in the source, we examined randomly selected 239 human plasma samples of which 51 were from Japanese donors' blood and 188 were from imported blood. Prevalences of neutralizing activity of VT1 in imported plasma and domestic plasma were 10.6% and 2.0%, respectively. The prevalence of neutralizing antibody in these plasma samples reflects the different neutralizing activity of VT1 in gamma-globulin preparations prepared from imported blood and Japanese donors' blood. From these results, by selecting the lot of gamma-globulin preparations or the material of plasma with highly neutralizing activity, intravenously administered immune globulin therapy may be effective for VT1. The lack of VT2-neutralizing activity in any gamma-globulin preparation promotes us to develop humanized anti-VT2-monoclonal antibody for the prevention of HUS in high risk children.
据报道,静脉注射免疫球蛋白疗法对产志贺毒素的大肠杆菌感染的重症患者是一种有效的治疗方法,而其对VT2的疗效仍在讨论中。因此,我们检测了市售免疫球蛋白制剂的体外抗VT中和抗体,期望保护患者免受如溶血尿毒综合征等严重并发症的影响。我们检测了日本5家制药公司生产的47批丙种球蛋白。其中29批由进口血液制备,18批由日本献血者的血液制备。各公司按照自己的生产工艺制备。使用ACHN(人肾腺癌)细胞通过细胞毒性测定VT1和VT2的中和活性。所有进口血液来源的丙种球蛋白制剂批次在浓度为12.5mg/ml时能完全中和125pg/ml的VT1,且生产工艺上未发现显著差异。另一方面,日本献血者血液来源的丙种球蛋白制剂中和VT1的能力比前者低五倍。所有制剂均未中和VT2。丙种球蛋白制剂由混合人血浆制成。为了解来源中中和活性的差异,我们随机检测了239份人血浆样本,其中51份来自日本献血者的血液,188份来自进口血液。进口血浆和国产血浆中VT1中和活性的患病率分别为10.6%和2.0%。这些血浆样本中中和抗体的患病率反映了从进口血液和日本献血者血液制备的丙种球蛋白制剂中VT1的中和活性不同。根据这些结果,通过选择具有高中和活性的丙种球蛋白制剂批次或血浆材料,静脉注射免疫球蛋白疗法可能对VT1有效。任何丙种球蛋白制剂均缺乏VT2中和活性,促使我们开发人源化抗VT2单克隆抗体,以预防高危儿童的溶血尿毒综合征。