• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

免疫忽视:情感预测中持久性偏差的一个来源。

Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting.

作者信息

Gilbert D T, Pinel E C, Wilson T D, Blumberg S J, Wheatley T P

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Sep;75(3):617-38. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.3.617.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.75.3.617
PMID:9781405
Abstract

People are generally unaware of the operation of the system of cognitive mechanisms that ameliorate their experience of negative affect (the psychological immune system), and thus they tend to overestimate the duration of their affective reactions to negative events. This tendency was demonstrated in 6 studies in which participants overestimated the duration of their affective reactions to the dissolution of a romantic relationship, the failure to achieve tenure, an electoral defeat, negative personality feedback, an account of a child's death, and rejection by a prospective employer. Participants failed to distinguish between situations in which their psychological immune systems would and would not be likely to operate and mistakenly predicted overly and equally enduring affective reactions in both instances. The present experiments suggest that people neglect the psychological immune system when making affective forecasts.

摘要

人们通常并未意识到改善其负面情绪体验的认知机制系统(心理免疫系统)的运作,因此他们往往会高估自己对负面事件的情感反应持续时间。在6项研究中证实了这种倾向,其中参与者高估了他们对恋爱关系破裂、未能获得终身教职、选举失败、负面性格反馈、儿童死亡描述以及被潜在雇主拒绝等情况的情感反应持续时间。参与者未能区分其心理免疫系统可能起作用和不太可能起作用的情况,并错误地预测在这两种情况下情感反应都会过度且同样持久。目前的实验表明,人们在进行情感预测时忽略了心理免疫系统。

相似文献

1
Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting.免疫忽视:情感预测中持久性偏差的一个来源。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Sep;75(3):617-38. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.3.617.
2
Motivated prediction of future feelings: effects of negative mood and mood orientation on affective forecasts.对未来感受的动机性预测:消极情绪和情绪取向对情感预测的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Sep;33(9):1265-78. doi: 10.1177/0146167207303014. Epub 2007 Jun 22.
3
The least likely of times: how remembering the past biases forecasts of the future.最不可能的时间:回忆过去如何影响对未来的预测。
Psychol Sci. 2005 Aug;16(8):626-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01585.x.
4
Reactions to Loss Scale: assessing grief in college students.对损失规模的反应:评估大学生的悲伤。
Omega (Westport). 2010;61(1):25-51. doi: 10.2190/OM.61.1.b.
5
Motivated underpinnings of the impact bias in affective forecasts.情感预测中影响偏差的动机基础。
Emotion. 2013 Dec;13(6):1023-9. doi: 10.1037/a0033797. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
6
Focalism: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting.聚焦主义:情感预测中持久性偏差的一个来源。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 May;78(5):821-36. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.5.821.
7
"How long will I suffer?" versus "How long will you suffer?" A self-other effect in affective forecasting.“我要遭受多久?”与“你要遭受多久?”:情感预测中的自我-他人效应
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Oct;95(4):899-917. doi: 10.1037/a0011619.
8
Accuracy and artifact: reexamining the intensity bias in affective forecasting.准确性与假象:重新审视情感预测中的强度偏差。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Oct;103(4):584-605. doi: 10.1037/a0029544. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
9
The impact bias in self and others: Affective and empathic forecasting in individuals with social anxiety.自我和他人的影响偏差:社交焦虑个体的情感和共情预测。
Behav Res Ther. 2018 Jul;106:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 May 7.
10
Trait self-esteem moderates the effect of initiator status on emotional and cognitive responses to romantic relationship dissolution.特质自尊调节了启动者身份对浪漫关系破裂的情绪和认知反应的影响。
J Pers. 2010 Aug 1;78(4):1271-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00650.x. Epub 2010 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Separable neural signals for reward and emotion prediction errors.用于奖励和情绪预测误差的可分离神经信号。
Nat Commun. 2025 Aug 22;16(1):7849. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63135-5.
2
Intersecting race/ethnicity and gender in physiological dysregulation profiles and associations with socioeconomic status among older adults in the United States.美国老年人生理失调特征中种族/族裔与性别的交叉情况及其与社会经济地位的关联
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Apr 26;30:101812. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101812. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Psychological flow and mental immunity as predictors of job performance for mental health care practitioners during COVID-19.
心理流畅和心理免疫作为心理健康护理从业者在 COVID-19 期间工作表现的预测指标。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 1;19(11):e0311909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311909. eCollection 2024.
4
How can restaurants entice patrons to order environmentally sustainable dishes? Testing new approaches based on hedonic psychology and affective forecasting theory.餐厅如何吸引顾客点选环境可持续的菜品?基于享乐心理学和情感预测理论测试新方法。
J Sustain Tour. 2023 Oct 25;32(10):2225-2244. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2023.2274283. eCollection 2024.
5
Anticipated Pleasure and Displeasure for Future Social and nonsocial Events: A Scale Development Study.对未来社交和非社交事件的预期愉悦与不悦:一项量表编制研究。
Schizophr Bull Open. 2023 Aug 22;4(1):sgad024. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad024. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
Discrete and dimensional approaches to affective forecasting errors.情感预测误差的离散和维度方法。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 23;15:1412398. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1412398. eCollection 2024.
7
Does variety in hedonic spending improve happiness? Testing alternative causal mechanisms between hedonic variety and subjective well-being.享乐消费多样性是否能提升幸福感?检验享乐多样性与主观幸福感之间的替代因果机制。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Feb 26;12(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01599-8.
8
Distinct patterns of incidental exposure to and active selection of radicalizing information indicate varying levels of support for violent extremism.不同的偶然接触和主动选择激进化信息的模式表明对暴力极端主义的支持程度不同。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 14;19(2):e0293810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293810. eCollection 2024.
9
Transformative Experiences, Cognitive Modelling and Affective Forecasting.变革性经历、认知建模与情感预测
Erkenntnis. 2024;89(1):65-87. doi: 10.1007/s10670-022-00523-z. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
10
How Will You Feel on Valentine's Day? Affective Forecasting and Recall Biases as a Function of Anxiety, Depression, and Borderline Personality Disorder Features.情人节时你会有怎样的感受?作为焦虑、抑郁和边缘型人格障碍特征函数的情感预测与回忆偏差。
J Soc Clin Psychol. 2022 Oct;41(5):491-516. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2022.41.5.491.