Badve S, A'Hern R P, Ward A M, Millis R R, Pinder S E, Ellis I O, Gusterson B A, Sloane J P
Department of Pathology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Hum Pathol. 1998 Sep;29(9):915-23. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(98)90196-4.
The increased detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by mammographic screening and the more widespread use of breast-conserving surgery have led to a search for histological features associated with the risk of recurrence. In a case control study of 141 patients with long follow-up, we compared the ability of five morphological classifications to predict recurrence after local excision. A significant correlation was not found between recurrence and growth pattern when a traditional classification based on architecture was used nor with necrosis when a scheme based principally on this feature was employed. A correlation was, however, found between recurrence and "differentiation" as defined by nuclear features and cell polarization in a classification recently formulated by the European Pathologists Working Group (EPWG), but this failed to reach statistical significance at the 5% level. A stronger and statistically significant correlation was found between nuclear grade as defined by the EPWG and recurrence when cell polarization was disregarded, using the classification currently employed by the UK National Health Service and European Commission-funded Breast Screening Programmes. This was attributable to a small number of recurring cases being downgraded as a consequence of exhibiting polarized cells. A significant correlation between histology and recurrence was also observed using the Van Nuys classification, which is based on nuclear grade and necrosis. Whether the tumor recurred as in situ or invasive carcinoma was unrelated to histological classification, as was the time course over which it occurred. These findings strongly support the use of nuclear grade to identify cases of DCIS at high risk of recurrence after local excision, but further work is necessary to determine whether nuclear grade or necrosis is more appropriate to subdivide the non-high-grade cases.
乳腺钼靶筛查对导管原位癌(DCIS)的检出率增加以及保乳手术的更广泛应用,促使人们寻找与复发风险相关的组织学特征。在一项对141例患者进行长期随访的病例对照研究中,我们比较了五种形态学分类方法预测局部切除术后复发的能力。当使用基于结构的传统分类方法时,未发现复发与生长模式之间存在显著相关性;当采用主要基于该特征的分类方案时,也未发现复发与坏死之间存在显著相关性。然而,在欧洲病理学家工作组(EPWG)最近制定的一种分类方法中,根据核特征和细胞极性定义的“分化”与复发之间存在相关性,但在5%的水平上未达到统计学显著性。当忽略细胞极性,使用英国国家医疗服务体系和欧盟委员会资助的乳腺筛查项目目前采用的分类方法时,EPWG定义的核分级与复发之间发现了更强且具有统计学显著性的相关性。这是由于少数复发病例因出现极化细胞而被降级。使用基于核分级和坏死的Van Nuys分类方法时,也观察到组织学与复发之间存在显著相关性。肿瘤是原位复发还是浸润性癌复发与组织学分类无关,其复发的时间进程也与组织学分类无关。这些发现有力地支持了使用核分级来识别局部切除术后DCIS复发高风险病例,但还需要进一步研究来确定核分级或坏死哪一个更适合对非高级别病例进行细分。